Dear KMAG: 20190907 Open Topic

Exactly. Now let me go back and intertwine our thinking.
Start off with the idea that IT WAS ODD. It was extremely odd. I noticed THAT at the beginning. When people said “Oh, no it’s headed straight to Mar-a-Lago”, and the TDS faction of the Democrats were CHEERING THE HURRICANE, I was at first thinking “yeah, well – THAT won’t last for long – it’s WEATHER. Just wait.”
But then, it just stayed on course. And so I was thinking “well, I guess that means our calculations are actually pretty good now.”
And then it kept staying on course And the COURSE was NOT GOOD. And no matter how the thing veered off, or stayed on course, it was going to cause trouble. And it was STILL headed to the Florida coast, and it’s looking to hurt not just Mar-a-Lago, but a lot more. At that point, I was thinking “this thing is really staying on an uncanny course.
And THEN Axios dumps out that article about Trump “nuking a hurricane”, and CANKLES comes out with her TAUNT. Which reminded me of the LAST TIME I remembered discussing nukes and hurricanes, in the context of the climate change hoax, in trying to explain how HUGE hurricanes actually are. They’re like 10000 nukes going off continuously. They’re BIG.
Now – here is where your idea of game theory – which is kinda what I was thinking – might make sense. But it only makes SENSE based on HIGHER POWERS affecting things.
Looking at it from our end, with THINGS WE UNDERSTAND NOW, which we might understand MORE in the future, one is almost forced by SCALE to go back to the beginning of the hurricane to affect it, but that is also where with our CURRENT understanding, we have no idea HOW to affect it. BUT, one sees that the PROBLEM ITSELF weakens into our domain, where we can less fantastically project a technological civilization might achieve higher powers (small letters) to affect the beginnings of a weather event.
But THAT means you have to PICK the right weather event to affect – one that THEORETICALLY could serve as a weapon. And THAT means one would have to have UNCANNY POWERS OF PREDICTION.
But let’s say one HAS that. Let’s say that powers of COMPUTING go up remarkably – and based on SECRET KNOWLEDGE (meaning Corso and Lazar), it sure seemed like there is potentially a trajectory of advancement of knowledge where HIGHER POWERS could have uncanny powers of computation and prediction, by our reckoning, and commit one or more small acts to FIND and MAINTAIN what might be called WEAPONIZABLE WEATHER.
That is FREAKY, but still “within the realm of possibility”.
In that case, the only way for us to interfere is to pretty much do the same thing, but in a chaotic way that ruins their calculations “after the fact”. Intervene SOMEWHERE both early and plausible in weather-world where we can create maximum “woulda been random” interference in things somewhere in the future. So for example, in a “nursed” hurricane – nursed and shepherded with technology far beyond our own, we gin up a storm 2000 miles away which OUR weak calculations show is an important factor in OUR weak predictions. We would thus be doing something “obvious” to them, that they HOPED we never saw, like holding up a cover object and deflecting a bullet.
But let’s say WE can’t do that, but SOMEBODY ELSE CAN – and they HELPED US. There is a point of view where it’s KINDA THE SAME THING. Are we DESERVING of God’s help? One description of God and this universe is a kind of FILTER of civilizations. Carl Sagan in his later, more “spiritual” years, started to see these bigger ideas where technological advance becomes so morally and ethically dependent that the abstract idea of GOD arises whether you WANT God or NOT. You may choose not to CALL it God, but that’s kinda what you’re dealing with.
Athanasius would totally get this, by the way. His obsession with trinity versus the Arian view was an insistence of certain symmetries that are important in the spiritual advancement he was advocating. Arianism was a kind of FLAWED unitarianism. Yes – one can technically view the “symmetries of the Christian worldview” their way, but it’s really a compromise with older Greco-Roman thought, and less insightful than either Judaism or Christianity, both of which I find very useful for reason of the “naturalness” of their symmetries.
And this is hard for a lot of people to do, but probably less hard for US HERE – to get PAST language and get PAST materialism and get PAST seeing things from the standpoint of physical human beings and MORE as spiritual beings, at which point religion and science themselves are more like languages to describe the universe between intelligent entities.
That’s kinda spooky, but that’s what we’re dealing with, IMHO.
Now I will not discard an alternative theory that all of this was a war of psychology, perception, public mind control, information and disinformation. THAT could explain it, too. Yet – weirdly – it parallels all the “physical” stuff I said above, but in a kind of “morality of information” world which is – AGAIN – what we would otherwise call “spiritual”, and AGAIN, the concept of GOD arises in fundamentally the exact same way, but without mediation by anything we would call “technology” – meaning a bunch of PROTONS moving around to game things.
You may see that thinking as well, and it’s kinda beautiful, but I’m resisting it for the moment because the SWEET SPOT of understanding the future DOES INDEED have a bunch of protons moving around, IMO, because I trust that Corso is INFORMATION and not DISINFORMATION, for reasons I don’t want to go into now.
Bottom line, I believe that God stopped that hurricane. The stuff in the middle – including a bunch of very cool stuff – is ours to understand and accept, but we won’t do THAT without GOD. Call GOD what you will.