The above royalty-free image of vintage vaccine vials and syringes is courtesy of Shutterstock and Google Images.
This post is a STOP PRESS offering. It details what is, in Yours Truly’s opinion, indisputable confirmation that the ingredients (and, by extension, the mechanisms) of the COVID-19 BTI (Bioweapon Toxin Injections, aka the COVID-19 “vaccines”) do indeed shed onto other persons, including onto non-“vaccinated” persons; and, that this shedding can result in multiple negative effects.
Since this post relates to the COVID-19 BTI (the COVID-19 “vaccines”), it is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s COVID-19 “vaccinated” brother, Sam, and to her cousin, Bill; and, to all persons who have passed away as a result (direct or indirect) of the COVID-19 BTI they have taken.
There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications, the Rules of our late, good Wheatie, and certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. The discussion is not limited to what is presented in this post.
There. Must. Be. Justice.
Yours Truly begins with the following blog post by Dr. Pierre Kory: https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/newly-published-study-shows-shedding, “Newly-Published Study Shows Shedding Of Covid mRNA Vaccine Products”, 9 December 2024. The study referred to is here: https://doi.org/10.56098/tp99wn15, “Menstrual Abnormalities Strongly Associated with Proximity to COVID-19 Vaccinated Individuals”, Sue E. Peters, PhD, James A. Thorp, MD, et al., 7 December 2024. This paper is HUGELY important as regards not only proof that the COVID-19 BTI (the COVID-19 “vaccines”) do indeed shed, but ALSO that there are multiple negative effects of this shedding for females who are in their childbearing years. Several screenshots from the paper are below, starting with the Abstract:
Then, a diagram of the non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” subgroup of females in the study:
Followed by a table listing the menstrual abnormalities reported among the non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” females who were in close proximity to COVID1-19 “vaccinated” persons:
Finally, the Conclusion of the paper:
The “exposure radius” for the cohort set of non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” females was 6 feet (or shorter) to COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons. These females reported the same types of menstrual issues that have been reported by COVID-19 “vaccinated” females.
Dr. Kory cites another paper, by independent researcher Helene Banoun, from 2023, which is also important to the situation. It is here: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310514, “mRNA: Vaccine or Gene Therapy? The Safety Regulatory Issues”, Helene Banoun, 21 June 2023.
There is now MUCH more than meets the eye regarding the shedding of the COVID-19 BTI (the COVID-19 “vaccines”), as found here (and also cited by Dr. Kory): www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/covid-19-vaccine-shedding-experiences, “What We’ve Learned from Over a Thousand Vaccine Shedding Reports”, by A Midwestern Doctor.
Back to the blog post by Dr. Pierre Kory: It is long and detailed, but Dr. Kory and A Midwestern Doctor have compiled an enormous amount of information about the COVID-19 BTI shedding phenomenon. Dr. Kory’s post has a list of chapters that have organized the material. Following are some screenshots from his post:
The above screenshot is from the Peters, Thorp, et al., paper cited above, listing items related to the development and implementation of the COVID-19 BTI (the COVID-19 “vaccines”.) It is important to understand that the Pfizer-BioNTech “clinical trial” (C4591001) was stopped at six months, in order for the company to give the data collected up to that point to the FDA in the fall of 2020. [Yours Truly: The six month timeframe was between late April (the start of the “clinical trial”) and late October-early November of 2020.] This was done by Pfizer-BioNTech so that their “flagship” COVID-19 BTI (“vaccine”), BNT162b2, could get through the “review process” by the FDA prior to securing that agency’s initial EUA for the use of BNT162b2 in the United States (this initial EUA was granted by the FDA on 11 December 2020.) [Yours Truly: C4591001 was “resumed” after the initial EUA was granted, under various “subsection trials” listed on clinicaltrials.gov/.] It is important to understand that Pfizer-BioNTech KNEW that shedding of BNT162b2 could occur — which is why the company asked that subjects in the C4591001 clinical trial report any exposure to pregnant females, or to the partner of a pregnant female “prior to the time of conception” (translation: the company ALSO KNEW that the fertility of MALES can be damaged by BNT162b2.)
Dr. Kory and A Midwestern Doctor did a thorough job of collating and organizing the details of the over 1,000 reports they received regarding shedding of the COVID-19 BTI (the COVID-19 “vaccines”.) What follows is a description of some of these details.
**** It appears that the most common “avenue” for COVID-19 BTI shedding is via spike protein “carried” by exosomes of the “vaccinated” person’s body. That’s right — exosomes, that “shuttle service” within the human body. Please see: www.theqtree.com/2024/12/13/the-dna-in-the-pfizer-biontech-modrna-covid-19-bioweapon-toxin-injections-aka-the-vaccines/. A screenshot from this post, regarding exosomes, is below:
The exosomes that “shuttle” the COVID-19 BTI spike protein can be exhaled; they can be on the surface of the skin; and, they can be “transferred” during sexual intercourse.
**** The post by Dr. Kory contains several sections in addition to the Chapters section. Some of the sections include:
“Evidence For Person-to-Person Shedding“
“Routes of Exposure” (exhalation; hugging [non-sexual]; sexual intercourse; skin-to-skin)
“Most Common Symptoms” of COVID-19 BTI (the “vaccines”) shedding: in females: menstrual abnormalities, including pregnancy termination; other types of gynecological issues; in men: groin pain; in general: headache; tinnitus; nose bleeds; painless bruising; dizziness; brain fog; immune-suppression symptoms; Shingles; skin rashes
“Less Frequent Symptoms“: Atrial fibrillation; muscle pain; seizures; insomnia; vision / eye problems, including microclots to the eyes.
“Rarer Symptoms“: blood clots; cancers; and, anxiety, among them.
**** Below is a screenshot of the graphic from Dr. Kory’s post, listing the symptoms:
**** Dr. Kory adds an important caveat, the “Clinical Guidance” section of his post. A screenshot from this section is below:
Yours Truly has written about the importance for non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons to NOT make themselves into “hermits”, to NOT stay away from “vaccinated” friends and family, and so on. On the other hand, in addition to the above from Dr. Kory, it may be worthwhile to wash the hands frequently; and, to consider using disposable gloves when putting gas into the car, or perhaps in a healthcare setting, and the like. It is also imperative for people to have, and to maintain, their general health and the health of their immune system at the best level possible.
**** And, continuing from there, part of the “Protection Strategies” section:
Yours Truly here. Now that it is confirmed that the COVID-19 BTI (the COVID-19 “vaccines”) do indeed shed, and can shed onto non-“vaccinated” persons, questions arise: Does this mean that any of the N1-Methylpseudouridine in the COVID-19 BTI can also shed via the “shuttle service” of the exosomes? What about the lipid nanoparticles in these injectables? And, since nobody really knows how long the COVID-19 BTI work in the body of the “vaccinated” person, how long does this shedding continue? What about shedding among COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons — are they constantly exposing other “vaccinated” persons to the ingredients (and mechanisms) of these injectables?
And, there is this, from Sasha Latypova: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/robert-malones-limited-hangout-confession, 11 December 2024. A screenshot of the post’s title is below:
For more information regarding the shedding of the COVID-19 BTI (the COVID-19 “vaccines”), please see: www.theqtree.com/2024/03/25/the-elephant-in-the-room-shedding-of-both-the-covid-19-virus-itself-and-the-covid-19-vaccines/.
THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.
Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA
TY PAVACA, a couple years back I had lunch with a friend who I was quite sure had taken the clot shot based on how our conversation went. We sat across the table from each other & conversed for more than an hour. We hugged before going our separate ways & we were both wearing cooler weather outer clothing. For about a week to a week & a half afterward I had strange tingling sensations along my back, approximately where her arms had been during our hug, as well as these poking/pinprick kind of sensations on my lower legs. During the course of the meal our legs were closer to each other under the table than were our torsos. I always wondered if I was experiencing some type of shedding phenomena back then. It was disturbing but I had no known lingering effects thankfully.
Valerie Curren
It sounds to me like some sort of COVID-19 “vaccine” shedding may have affected you. Thank goodness the effects didn’t linger.
That’s the only thing that made sense to me too, but it was very strange at the time.
Thank you very much for this report. You have been doing Yeoman’s work bring all the Clotshot Depopulation info to the QTree.
Gail Combs
Thank you. This situation of COVID-19 “vaccine” shedding is actually quite horrifying.
And that taxpayer funds were used / are being used, to fuel the entire COVID-19 situation is also horrifying.
This is horrifying. When you think about it, pretty much every unvaxxed person in the country has been affected by this – and is still being affected since they are still giving these nasty jabs to people. Unless they’re a complete hermit, they’ve been around someone who is vaxxed when you consider the total number of people who have had at least 1 jab. I have many family members who have been jabbed that I’ve been around a lot. The depop people didn’t even need to get everyone jabbed to hurt us all. There is no punishment bad enough for those people.