Do not forget the selling of CARBON CREDITS….

From my old notes:

The World Bank was boasting it was a multi-billion dollar industry.

United Nation’s Clean Development Mechanism Report:

“…Africa is already experiencing social and environmental upheaval from land grabs motivated by a large-scale rush for biofuel crop production, even as the science shows that the CO2 reductions from biofuels are highly questionable, and the social and environmental consequences, negative. The African continent has also seen disastrous impacts from large-scale plantations of exotic tree species that particularly affect local water resources….”

http://www.africanbiodiversity.org/system/files/PDFs/CDM%20Report_Feb2011_lowres.pdf

Daniel H says: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/24/the-scandal-deepens-ipcc-ar4-riddled-with-non-peer-reviewed-wwf-papers/#comment-298859
January 24, 2010 at 8:19 pm
I worked at WWF as a programmer back in my early 20s and I was still sort of naive about global warming and environmentalism in general. The job was located at their Washington, DC headquarters and I was hired to create a new database for their “Climate Savers” program. The idea was to keep better track of the enormous revenue streams that they’d extort from Fortune 500 companies in exchange for not waging organized media campaigns against them (Nike, HP, Dupont, etc).
Their Climate Change Department was staffed by creepy fanatics who would run around screaming about how Bush stole the election and other crazy things about whales and “climate justice”. I was young and didn’t know what to make of it all so I just shrugged it off. Anyway, the head of the Climate Change Department was this freaky woman named Jenifer Morgan. We just called her “the forehead” because of her massive forehead[1]. She threatened to leave DC if Bush was not impeached for war crimes. She kept her promise and got transfered to Bonn, Germany along with her personal assistants.
Last I heard, she no longer works for WWF but continues to fly all around the world on behalf of her new environmentalist NGO.
The WWF headquarters building was a state of the art corporate complex with lots of plants but of course they kept the AC cranked up full blast during the hot DC summer months. In the basement there was a modern gym that employees were encouraged to use so I started using it after work. A lot of these guys who were “campaigners” would blatantly hit on me but I’d just ignore them and keep to myself. Later I stopped going to the gym after I personally witnessed some sort of lurid gay sex going on in the locker room.
I left WWF shortly thereafter.
Anyway, the shocking fanaticism and hypocrisy that I’d witnessed made me curious to learn more about the issue of climate change and what it was all about. That was when I officially became a skeptic.
True story.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The Cabal wants to plant eucalyptus trees in Africa as a means of producing ‘Carbon Credits.

PALATABILITY :
Bluegum eucalyptus foliage is unpalatable to cattle, sheep, and goats”
http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/tree/eucglo/all.html#7
The grass “fogged” with eucalyptus oil would also be “unpalatable”
No one comes out and says it directly but you know if a goat won’t eat it most other herbivores won’t except for adapted Australian species. That is what is meant by “creates a loss of habitats for many species”
A eucalyptus forest planted in Africa or South America creates an “ecology” devoid of other life.

I have done a search and found “eucalyptus” refers to more than one species of tree. Those introduced to Calif. USA do not produce good lumber although they are a major fire hazard. Tasmanian Blue Gum (eucalyptus globulus) seems to be the main culprit, in fire hazard and allelopathic properties (prevent other plants from sprouting)

There is a good synopsis at http://www.hear.org/pier/wra/pacific/eucalyptus_globulus_htmlwra.htm
The most alarming comment aside from the fact it is not eaten by livestock is that it is an invasive monoculture weed.

<i><b>(1)”Blue gum typically grows in dense monospecific stands.” (2)”The loss of biodiversity and habitat is a great threat from the Tasmanian Blue Gum tree, as it is from any eucalyptus. It creates virtual monocultures and can rapidly take over surrounding compatible areas, completely changing the ecosystem. That monoculture creates a loss of habitats for many species that relied on the previous system. Due to its great capacity for taking over a wide variety of habitats, the Blue Gum eucalyptus could possibly spread to a great range of systems where there is enough water content and create huge monocultures.”</i></b>

There is also information that if the stump is left the tree will just resprout, and grow 20 feet in one year if it already has established roots from before it was cut down to a stump. This is considered an “Advantage”by the forestry companies but for third world people dealing with an invasive species this would be a nightmare.

Just for reference so we know exactly what is being dumped on the African People in the name of “Global Warming” aka the human extermination project. (Given the characteristics of eucalyptus and its introduction not only in Africa but world wide it IS a human extermination project, Anthony)

I have done a search and found “eucalyptus” refers to more than one species of tree. Those introduced to Calif. USA do not produce good lumber although they are a major fire hazard. Tasmanian Blue Gum (eucalyptus globulus) seems to be the main culprit, in fire hazard and allelopathic properties (prevent other plants from sprouting)

There is a good synopsis at http://www.hear.org/pier/wra/pacific/eucalyptus_globulus_htmlwra.htm
The most alarming comment aside from the fact it is not eaten by livestock is that it is an invasive monoculture weed.

<i><b>(1)”Blue gum typically grows in dense monospecific stands.” (2)”The loss of biodiversity and habitat is a great threat from the Tasmanian Blue Gum tree, as it is from any eucalyptus. It creates virtual monocultures and can rapidly take over surrounding compatible areas, completely changing the ecosystem. That monoculture creates a loss of habitats for many species that relied on the previous system. Due to its great capacity for taking over a wide variety of habitats, the Blue Gum eucalyptus could possibly spread to a great range of systems where there is enough water content and create huge monocultures.”</i></b>

There is also information that if the stump is left the tree will just resprout, and grow 20 feet in one year if it already has established roots from before it was cut down to a stump. This is considered an “Advantage”by the forestry companies but for third world people dealing with an invasive species this would be a nightmare.