Author: PAVACA

BFA in Piano; BFA in Music Education; MA in Leadership. Retired professional musician and soprano, teacher, composer, accompanist/coach. General Editor of Imagination-Building: The Memoirs of John Douglas Forbes (1910 - 2018), First Professor of the Darden School of the University of Virginia. Writes under the names of: M.E. Forbes; M.E.C. Forbes; PAVACA.

Health Friday 10.31.2025 Open Thread: Echoes

My older brother, Sam, circa 1960 – 1961, dressed to perform in a school band concert:

My older brother, Sam, December 2021:

My older brother, Sam, early summer 2024, after his having taken at least five injections of a COVID-19 “vaccine”, beginning in early 2021:

Requiescat in Pace aeterna, frater mi. Lux perpetua tibi luceat.

My older brother, Sam: 24 November 1948 – 29 October 2024.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. Today’s offering is dedicated to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had injected into their body. May they rest in eternal Peace.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie;, and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except perhaps for AI-generated images within URL links. If readers wish to add AI-generated content to today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

————————————————————

My older brother, Sam, passed away on 29 October 2024. He was only 75 years old. He had taken at least five (possibly, six) injections of COVID-19 “vaccines”, starting in early 2021. His last “vaccine” injection was taken around Thanksgiving of 2023, although he may have been given yet another shot while he was residing in a nursing home in the early fall of 2024. Yours Truly has written for this board regarding the health decline of Sam after he took the COVID-19 “vaccine” shot in November 2023: please see https://www.theqtree.com/2024/10/18/health-friday-10-18-2024-special-edition-neurological-effects-of-the-covid-19-vaccines-physical-and-psychological/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2025/07/25/health-friday-7-25-2025-open-thread-more-on-the-covid-19-vaccines-and-what-they-do-to-the-brain/. Within the period of fewer than six months after his taking that COVID-19 “vaccine” shot in November 2023, my brother had lost interest in things he had once enjoyed, such as helping out with his grandchildren; had stopped going to church; had a “freak accident” in which he wrecked his car and then decided not to drive again; had lost interest in taking care of himself and eating properly; and so on. Then, there was the catastrophic fall he sustained in his home in early July 2023; then, to two weeks in the ICU; then, to be being discharged to a nursing home; then, to the diagnosis of “sudden-onset dementia” at that facility; then, to his losing the ability to walk and becoming bed-bound; then, to his contracting pneumonia in late October 2023 at this facility; then, to his death.

My brother had co-morbidities that complicated his health profile: among them, COPD from decades of smoking (he quit in 2010 after that diagnosis and was treated); and, prostate cancer (diagnosed and treated in 2019.) He had lost his wife in the October 2018, just shy of their 47th wedding anniversary; she passed away from an undiagnosed aneurysm that ruptured. He had spent several years after her death taking counseling and medications, which assisted in his processing of this tragedy.

What ultimately happened with my brother was despite the fact that he had “good longevity genes” in his makeup — there were multiple older members on both sides of our birth family who had lived well beyond their 80th, and even their 90th, birthdays. What happened with my brother was also despite the fact that he had made it a point of taking better care of his health since the diagnosis of COPD in 2010. While it is not possible for Yours Truly to state this definitively, I will say I firmly believe that it was the ingredients and mechanisms of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that Sam took which, over time and incrementally, compromised his brain — cognitively and emotionally — with terrible consequences. I firmly believe that it was the COVID-19 “vaccine” injection that my brother took at Thanksgiving 2023 which was the “straw that broke the camel’s back” for him.

However, even before my brother passed away, Yours Truly’s cousin Bill died in September 2023, a “died suddenly and unexpectedly” situation. Cousin Bill had also had taken COVID-19 “vaccines”, starting in 2021. By early 2022, this previously-healthy, active man had been diagnosed with cardiac problems and was undergoing treatment. According to what I understand of the issue, he was “doing well” in treatment. I am also more than fairly certain that my cousin Bill continued to take COVID-19 “booster vaccine” injections, likely based on the recommendations of his doctors. And then, September 2023 happened. Cousin Bill’s death was the first close-family death of the COVID-19 era for Yours Truly. To say that his death was hard for me is an understatement. I have good memories of cousin Bill. His father had passed away in 1993; his mother had passed away in 2017. They did not have to deal with the death of their son.

To say that the passing away of my own brother was devastating to Yours Truly is an understatement of Malthusian proportions. His death has shaken me down to my core. The last time I spoke to him (by phone) was twelve days before his death. It was heartbreaking and gut-wrenching to hear him fighting the “sudden-onset dementia” that had closed in on his brain. To know that he would never leave the nursing home, go back to his house and his nice old dog, go and be with his adult children and his grandchildren. To hear him tell me to send him books on the Civil War or World War II so he could “brush up” on his reading (the truth was, that by this time, he couldn’t read more than one or two sentences from anything.) To know that what had happened to him was so senseless, so incredibly senseless. It was (and still is) heartbreaking to go through the “what-if?” scenarios in my head — What if he had listened to me when I tried to warn him about the dangers of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, and refused to take any more of those injections? What if he had taken Ivermectin to try and clear out at least some of the COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced damage to his body and mind? What if the ingredients and mechanisms of the COVID-19 “vaccines” Sam took aggravated the lung damage from his COPD? What if the ingredients and mechanisms of the COVID-19 “vaccines” he took aggravated or re-established any emotional / psychological issues still lingering after the death of his beloved wife? What if? What if? Our mother had passed away in 1992; our father, in 2006. They did not have to deal with the death of Sam.

Yours Truly is not writing the above in order to solicit sympathy. I am writing the above to illustrate the kinds of things that went on — that are going on now — and, that will go on — in millions of families when the damage induced by the COVID-19 “vaccines” that were taken by family members starts to present (and the damaging effects that have started to present already.) It is all well and good to have a general “working knowledge” of the negative effects these “vaccines” (Bioweapon Toxin Injections) can, and do, induce in those who take them. It is quite another thing to lose close family members due to the negative effects of these “vaccines” that they took. It is quite another thing to have to deal with the knowledge that loved ones in the “here and now” who are COVID-19 “vaccinated” have had their bodies and brains damaged from these “vaccines.” It is quite another thing to listen to them tell those who try to warn them that they aren’t interested — that they “follow the science”; that they “trust their doctor”; among other responses.

Yours Truly will therefore say to those reading today’s offering who have taken COVID-19 “vaccines”:

**** The COVID-19 “vaccines” in your body have already damaged your natural immune system, perhaps even destroyed it: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-bnt162b2-mrna-vaccine-against, “‘The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses”, 16 December 2021. Please see the screenshot from her article, below, the Figure 3 from the cited paper in the article:

Figure 3 shows how the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” systematically damage and destroy the natural immune system cells of the “vaccinated” person’s body.

**** The COVID-19 “vaccines” in your body are damaging your heart and lungs: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf, “Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality”, Michael Palmer, MD, and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD, 18 August 2022. Please see the screenshots of Slide 7 and its description from the above paper, which clearly shows myocarditis induced by modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”:

Please see the screenshot of Slide 12 from the above paper, which clearly shows lung damage induced by modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”:

Note: the slides in the above paper are from autopsies of persons who passed away after COVID-19 “vaccination.”

**** The COVID-19 “vaccines” in your body crossed the Blood-Brain Barrier and damaged the cells and functions of your brain: https://eurmedres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40001-023-00992-0, “A review of neurological side effects of COVID-19 vaccination”, Roya Hosseini and Nayere Askari, 25 February 2023. Please see the screenshot of Figure 1 from this paper, below:

**** The COVID-19 “vaccines” in your body can induce psychosis: https://nature.com/articles/s41380-024-02627-0, “Psychiatric adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination: A population-based cohort study in Seoul, South Korea”, Eun Mi Chun, et al., 4 June 2024. Please see the screenshot of Figure 2 from this paper, below:

It is a mistake to dismiss the above paper and its conclusions “because it’s from South Korea.” The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” used in South Korea that are examined for the above paper are the same as those used in the United States (COMIRNATY, by Pfizer-BioNTech; and, SPIKEVAX, by Moderna.)

**** The COVID-19 “vaccines” in your body will alter your DNA and change your body’s genomic codes. These effects are permanent, and are involved in cancers that present after COVID-19 “vaccination”: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-first-peer-reviewed-study-715, “BREAKING: First Peer-Reviewed Study Finds Direct Molecular Evidence of mRNA “Vaccine” Genomic Integration”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 14 October 2025. Please see the screenshot from this article, below (the image was AI-generated):

**** The COVID-19 “vaccines” in your body, if you are a female, have destroyed up to 60% of the lifetime supply of eggs in your ovaries: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/mrna-shots-are-crippling-humanitys, “mRNA Shots Are Crippling Humanity’s Ability to Reproduce—And No Government is Ending COVID-19 Vaccination”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 15 May 2025. Please see the screenshot from this article, below (Yours Truly believes that the graphic image of how COVID-19 “vaccines” destroy primordial follicles is AI-generated):

**** Every injection of a COVID-19 “vaccine” WILL SHORTEN THE LIFE OF THE “VACCINE” RECIPIENT: Please see: https://slaynews.com/news/major-study-confirms-covid-vaccine-dose-shortens-lives-recipients/, “Major Study Confirms Every Covid ‘Vaccine’ Dose ‘Shortens the Lives of Recipients'”, by Frank Bergman, 14 October 2025. The published paper is here: https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/123/423, “Were the COVID-19 Shots Good, Bad, or Just Ugly? Dispensing with the Only Reasonable Objection to the Empirical Fact that Each Dose of the COVID-19 Shots, on the Average, Shortened the Lives of the Recipients”, John W. Oller, Jr., PhD, and Daniel Santiago, PharmD, 7 October 2025. Screenshots from this paper are below; first, of the Figure 2 from the paper, the all-age mortality figures reported to Public Health England:

Followed by Table 3 from the paper, the Connecticut Medicare Records:

Next, of Figure 5 from the paper, also derived from the Connecticut Medicare Records:

Then, from the Conclusions section of the paper:

These are the COVID-19 “vaccines” that you allowed to be injected into your body.

These are the COVID-19 “vaccines” that you allowed to be injected into the bodies of your children.

And why did you allow these unproven-technology, not-completely tested, “vaccines” to be put into your body, and into the bodies of your children? Because you “trusted the science“; because you “trusted your doctor“; because you were told that “it was the right thing to do“; because you were told that the COVID-19 “vaccines” were “safe and effective“; because you were told that the “the known and potential benefits of the COVID-19 vaccines outweigh the known and potential risks”; because you were told to “get COVID-19 vaccinated in order to keep yourself, your children, and your parents, safe“; because were you told “get COVID-19 vaccinated in order to keep your job, in order to travel, in order to go to school.” You were lied to. Every step of the way. Lied to by the government — by the CDC and the FDA — by your doctors — by your employer — by your school. They are continuing to lie to you.

The above is courtesy of https://www.theburningplatform,com/2025/10/27/why-are-these-criminals-free/. The Five Times August tweet is here: https://x.com/FiveTimesAugust/status/1982469251098153444.

Yours Truly has questions for those reading today’s offering who are COVID-19 “vaccinated”:

**** What are you going to do to try and mitigate the damage that these injections have done to your body and brain? To the bodies and brains of your children?

**** What are you going to do to educate yourself regarding how dangerous and deadly these injections are?

**** Do you plan to challenge and question any “recommendation” or “mandate” to have yourself and/or your children injected with more COVID-19 “vaccine” shots?

**** Do you plan to at least think about refusing to take any more COVID-19 “vaccines”, and to think about refusing COVID-19 “vaccines” being injected into your children?

Interested persons may wish to investigate these websites:

The Wellness Company (Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD): https://www.twc.health

Leading Edge Clinic (Dr. Pierre Kory, MD): https://drpierrekory.com/

Independent Medical Alliance (Dr. Joseph Varon, MD): https://imahealth.org/

For those medical professionals who are COVID-19 “vaccinated”, Yours Truly has extra questions, below. These are based on my 5 1/2+ years of being an independent COVID-19 researcher and writer:

**** With all due respect: Have you recognized that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” induce multiple types of serious adverse events, medical conditions, and can also kill? Have you read this report?: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, 5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021, FDA time-stamped on 30 April 2021 09:26 (GMT).

**** With all due respect: Do you understand, that since you are COVID-19 “vaccinated”, there is a strong likelihood that you have also had negative effects induced from these “vaccines”?

**** With all due respect: Why are you still recommending and/or administering these “vaccines”, given the above evidence of damage and death induced by these injectables? Did you perform your own research into the COVID-19 “vaccines” to satisfy yourself that the CDC / FDA claims of “safe and effective” regarding these injectables were / are, true? And, with all due respect, before there are objections to what Yours Truly is writing, please see these websites, by medical doctors, who have actually investigated the COVID-19 “vaccines” and know how dangerous and deadly they are : https://www.thefocalpoints.com/ (Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH); https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/ (Dr. Pierre Kory, MD, MPA, Certified Tribal Practitioner); https://doctors4covidethics.org/ (Dr. Michael Palmer, MD, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, MD); https://imahealth.org/ (Dr. Joseph Varon, MD, FCCM, FCCP).

**** With all due respect: Why are you not demanding that your employer; your State Medical Licensing Board; your medical professional organization; your Medical Specialty Credentialing organization; the CDC, FDA, AMA — impartially investigate the mounting evidence that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” are dangerous and deadly? Do you, perhaps, have concerns about “retribution” from these entities by doing so?

————————————————–

Yours Truly will remember the echoes of my older brother, Sam, before he started taking COVID-19 “vaccines.” I will remember the echoes of my Cousin Bill before he “died suddenly and unexpectedly.” The pain and the sense of loss from their deaths will never completely go away, since the human mind stores everything in the subconscious and the memory. One can only integrate the pain and the sense of loss into their own being in the healthiest way possible while moving onward.

And, in memory of those who have passed away from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they took, “The Lark Ascending”, by Ralph Vaughan Williams: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZR2JIDnT218&list=RDZRJIDnT218&start_radio=1

The COVID-19 “vaccines” — ALL OF THEM — MUST be removed from the market and from use. NOW.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer: With the exception of URL links to scientific papers and online articles listed above, the ideas and conclusions of today’s offering are by PAVACA. Proper credit must be given to PAVACA if other blog writers, social media, podcasters, or print media, use or refer to the ideas and conclusions of today’s offering.)

Health Friday 10.24.2025 Open Thread: A Cautionary Tale

The free header stock image of a nursing home is courtesy of Vecteezy and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except possibly that which is contained in URL links in today’s post. If readers wish to add AI-generated content to today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Please take a moment and remember our good GA/FL (Georgia Sibyl Swink Smith), who passed away on 8 October 2025. The time, energy, and ingenunity that GA/FL invested into decades of taking care of her late daughter, “Sally Q” Smith, after the latter’s diagnosis of Friedreich’s Ataxia at the age of 14, was amazing and inspiring. Sally Q passed away from the effects of this condition on 10 May 2025. Georgia was a devout Christian. May she and her daughter rest in eternal Peace. GA/FL will be sorely missed.

Today’s offering begins here: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2025/10/04/keeping-the-elderly-sheep-in-line/, by Donald Jefferies. The article is about nursing homes. Two screenshots from his article are below:

Yours Truly comes from a birth family that, on both sides, had a horror of having to go into “a home” (“a home” was “code” for a nursing home or care facility.) Grandparents, aunts, uncles — even one’s own father — vigorously preferred to remain at home, no matter what, and stay away from congregate living of any kind. Only as a last resort, did my maternal grandmother have to go to live at a nursing home. I think she had a premonition that she would not “come out alive” from the facility. She was correct. My own brother was discharged from the hospital to a nursing home, but that, too, was under “last resort” circumstances; he, also, did not “come out alive” from the facility. In both the cases of my maternal grandmother and of my brother, there were extremely serious medical conditions which excluded their ever living at their own homes again.

Nursing homes and care / rehabilitation facilities in the United States are inspected by the state health agencies where these are located. CMS (Medicare / Medicaid) will step in if a nursing home or care facility fails to meet state inspection standards, or if complaints are filed with either the state health department or CMS regarding a nursing home or care / rehabilitation facility. Please see: https://www.cms.gov/medicare/health-safety-standards/enforcement/nursing-home-enforcement, last updated 21 April 2025.

Nursing homes and care / rehabilitation facilities in the United States were especially negatively affected by the COVID-19 disaster. During the “lockdown” period, these places became off-limits to family and friends of the residents / patients. Untold numbers of these residents / patients died alone. Untold numbers of residents / patients were injected with the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, whether they consented to this or not. According to data complied by the CDC, residents / patients of these facilities had increased risk of death if they were “vaccinated” against COVID-19: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/cdc-nursing-home-data-the-vaccine, “CDC Nursing Home Data: The vaccine increased the risk of the elderly dying from COVID”, Steve Kirsch, 5 September 2023. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

The AMA (American Medical Association), on the other hand, made it clear, also in 2023, that deaths among the COVID-19 “vaccinated” simply underscored the “need” for persons to get a COVID-19 “vaccine booster shot”: https://www.ama-assn.org/public-health/infectious-diseases/why-covid-19-deaths-among-vaccinated-show-boosters-matter, Cynthia Cos, et al., 7 March 2023. Please see the screenshots from this article, below, in which Dr. Elaine Choi (a member of the AMA) is “explaining” why COVID-19 “vaccine booster shots” are a good thing, even though “vaccinated” persons were then dying from COVID:

Currently, the AMA, among other professional medical organizations, is speaking out regarding what they term the “new restrictions against COVID-19 vaccination” that were put into place by HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., earlier this year. One example of such “speaking out” is here: https://www.chiefhealthexecutive.com/view/defending-vaccines-ama-nursing-leaders-speak-out, Ron Southwick, 22 September 2025. There is a video embedded in the article; two screenshots from the article’s text are below:

Note the old (and misinformation) canard about “if you’re young and healthy, get a COVID-19 vaccine so your grandparents won’t get COVID” from Mensik Kennedy.

Steve Kirsch posted an article this week on his Substack blog regarding the Japan CMRR data, which proves that the more COVID-19 “vaccine” injections a person takes, the more risk that person has of dying: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/japan-cmrr-data-website-shows-clear, “Japan CMRR data website shows clear mortality increase caused by COVID shot”, 20 October 2025. Please see the screenshot from his article, below. (Note: CMRR = Cumulative Mortality Risk Ratio.) The first screenshot is of the general summary chart:

The second screenshot is from the Kirsch KCOR analysis of the Japan data, along with text summary;

To access the KCOR analysis, please see: https://medicalfacts.info/kcor.rb.

Applying all of the above to persons who, for whatever reason, are residents / patients in nursing homes or care / rehabilitation facilities: How do these people, if they do NOT want to take a COVID-19 “vaccine” injection, make their decision clear to the staff, including to the medical staff? How are these people assured, that if they do NOT want to take a COVID-19 “vaccine” injection, and there is an outbreak of COVID at the facility, that they will have access to Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin D, Zinc, and other alternative treatments for prevention or treatment of a COVID infection? How are these people assured, if they do NOT want to take a COVID-19 “vaccine” injection, that they will NOT be moved into a “segregated area” of the facility; or, worse yet, be told (or, their family / guardian be told) that the resident / patient “has to find another facility?” The issue is compounded by the fact that almost all nursing homes and care / rehabilitation facilities receive CMS funding or payments of some kind. Also, there is the “Next Generation Gold Standard” of “evidence-based COVID-19 vaccination” guidelines that were announced and implemented by HHS / NIH / CDC / FDA earlier this year. These guidelines “recommend” that persons age 65 and older get a COVID-19 “booster shot” TWICE a year. What does this mean for the person living in a nursing home in, for example, Alabama, (a facility that receives CMS funding or payments) — a person who is competent to make their own decisions, and who decides to refuse to take a COVID-19 “vaccine” injection? What if that person refuses because of religious belief? What if the person refuses because the “vaccine” contains elements lab-recreated from aborted fetal blood cell lines (the HEK293 lines?) Does the facility then “have the right”, because of the “new guidelines” in the “Evidence-Based Approach to COVID-19 Vaccination” that have been implemented, to override the person’s decision and give the injection anyway? Does the facility now “have the right” to tell the person’s children / guardian that they need to “find another facility” to take the person? Please see: https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-nih-announce-generation-gold-standard.html; also, https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsb2506929, “An Evidence-Based Approach to COVID-19 Vaccination”, Martin Makary, MD, MPH, and Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH. Dr. Makary is the Commissioner of the FDA; Dr. Prasad is the Director of the CBER Division of the FDA. Please see the screenshot of Figure 3 from this NEJM paper, below:

Please see the latest CDC immunization schedule recommendations for persons age 19 years and older as of 1 October 2025, here: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/adult-age.html#table-age. A screenshot of the schedule is below:

In addition, please see the age 65 and older immunization schedule recommendations for other injectables on the chart above — Influenza; RSV; pneumonia; Monkeypox; Herpes Zoster (“Shingles”); Hepatitis A and Hepatitis B; and more.

There is now supposed to be “Shared Clinical Decision-Making” between patient and healthcare provider regarding the COVID-19 “vaccines” for persons age 19 and above. Does that also apply across the board to persons living in nursing homes or care / rehabilitation facilities who are competent, but the facility they reside or stay in is also receiving CMS and/or Medicare-Medicaid payments?

There are multiple “Notes” sections regarding the administration of the other “vaccines” listed above in persons age 65 and older (and, in some cases, age 60 and older.) These “Notes” are found here: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/adult-notes.html#note-covid-19; please scroll down this webpage and click on the topic to read about, such as, “Influenza vaccination.” There are multiple “vaccines” that are considered to be “routine”, such as the influenza “vaccine”, the RSV “vaccine”, and so on. What if a person living in a nursing home or care / rehabilitation facility decides to refuse all of these “routine” injectables, or decides to take only one or two? What happened to “Shared Clinical Decision-Making” in regards to this? Especially in light of new research that proves, for example, that the pneumonia “vaccines” actually increase the risk of contracting pneumonia and dying from said infection? Please see: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-223-million-person-study, “BREAKING: 2.23 Million Person Study Finds Pneumococcal Vaccines Increase Risk of Pneumonia and Death”, Nicolas Hulscher, 22 October 2025.

And, what about the COVID-19 “vaccinated” personnel (administration staff; doctors; nurses; CNAs / PCAs; facility maintenance staff; kitchen staff, etc.) who work at these nursing homes or care / rehab facilities? What about the “downstream Medical Tsunami” of negative effects on them of the “vaccines” that they took, which will present at some point, if not already? What about potential staff loss / turnover?

And, what about the vast majority of the adult children of these residents / patients, who are themselves also COVID-19 “vaccinated” — including the adult children who have already taken multiple injections of these “vaccines?” What about the “downstream Medical Tsunami” of negative effects on them of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they took, which will present at some point, if not already?

And, what about the potential for another “pandemic emergency” being declared (including from some type of Avian Influenza outbreak) that “mandates” another round of “lockdowns”, which would effect nursing homes or care / rehab facilities?

In Yours Truly’s opinion, these are all things that need to be brought into the daylight and discussed. They represent another “ripple effect” aspect of the ongoing disaster of COVID-19.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer: With the exception of links to published scientific papers, website articles, and other items in the public domain, the ideas and conclusions in this post are by PAVACA. Proper credit must be given if ideas or conclusions of this post are used by other blog writers, or on social media, or in print media. Thank you.)

Health Friday 10.17.2025 Open Thread: LINE-1, Chromosomes, and the modRNA COVID-19 “Vaccines”: Part Two

The free vintage header image for today’s offering of human chromosomes as drawn by hand is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. Today’s offering is dedicated to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have suffered injuries, illnesses, or disabilities resulting from an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself, or from having been injected with the COVID-19 “vaccines”; and, to those who have died from either an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself, or from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had taken.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. These are linked here. Note 1: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except possibly for some items embedded in linked URLS. If readers wish to add AI-generated content to today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Note 2: Starting with today’s offering, there will be an “Intellectual Property” notice at the end of the post. This is because Yours Truly has noticed that another blog has apparently modified and used certain information in a Health Friday post on their own blog without giving credit to Yours Truly. Thank you.

Yours Truly posted Part One of the LINE-1 and Chromosome 19 situation regarding the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” here: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/09/25/health-friday-9-5-2025-open-thread-human-line-1-chromosomes-and-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines-part-one/. Part One discussed the (permanent) alteration to the LINE-1 human cell line that was designed into the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” Part Two will discuss the alteration to the human Chromosome 19 (along with alteration to other human chromosomes) that were ALSO designed into the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” To begin Part Two, here is a “refresher” on the paper that was published by Ralph Baric, PhD, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, on “Synthetic Genomics.” This paper has multiple graphics that display his “templates” for lab-creating synthetic viruses that are “programmed” to alter the DNA, the cells, and the chromosomes of humans: https://www.jcvi.org/stes/default/files/assets/projects/synthetic-genomics-options-for-governance/Baric-Synthetic-Viral-Genomics.pdf, “Synthetic Viral Genomics: Risks and Benefits for Science and Society”, Ralph S. Baric, PhD, 2006. Screenshots of a few of the graphics in this paper are below:

Note the phrase, “…reverse genetics and directed evolution.” Keep this phrase in mind for later in today’s offering.

And now, Yours Truly presents Part Two, beginning with human Chromosome 19, one of the 23 pairs of chromosomes that make up the human chromosome “map.” Below is an image of human Chromosome 19, per Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromosome_19.) One of the two parts of the chromosome pair is from the father; the other is from the mother:

What does human Chromosome 19 do? The following if from https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/chromosome/19: first, a general Description of human Chromosome 19:

Then, a description of a set of conditions called 19p13.13 Deletion Syndrome:

A short discussion of other types of conditions related to human Chromosome 19 issues:

And, human Chromosome 19 in relation to Cancers:

Below is a screenshot of the Chromosome 19 Disease Map that was published in 1997 (https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/gte.1997.1.145, “Disease genes and chromosomes: disease maps of the human genome. Chromosome 19”, by F Gilbert):

There has been more research since 1997 into human Chromosome 19 and its relationship to diseases and health conditions. An example is here: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91924-7, “Mutant p53 and chromosome 19 microRNA cluster overexpression regulate cancer testis antigen expression and cellular transformation in hepatocellular carcinoma”, Goodwin G. Jinesh, et al., 16 June 2021. Two screenshots from the Introduction of this paper are below:

Take a look again at the 1997 graphic above, and note the areas of human Chromosome 19q.13, q.13.2, q13.32, and q13.34 on the Disease Map that influence the body. An interesting paper from 2018 regarding human Chromosome 19 and what occurs when there is dysregulation is here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6112826/, “Cancer and the junkyard chromosome: how repeat DNA sequence on chromosome 19 influences risk of malignant disease”, Anne M. Rose, 10 August 2018. Two screenshots from this paper are below. The point here is that human Chromosome 19 is a “rich and fertile ground” for those who wish to experiment with how to alter certain areas of the chromosome, such as the p area or the q area; both of these chromosome 19 areas influence multiple organs and functions of the human body:

Yours Truly has written about the deleterious effects that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” have on the immensely important p53 protein of the human body: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/01/10/health-friday-open-thread-1-10-2025/p53-sv40-the-covid-19-vaccines-and-cancer-with-a-note-on-the-virus-itself/; and, https://www.thetree.com/2025/02/28/health-friday-2-28-2025-open-thread-more-on-p53-the-guardian-of-the-genome-and-tumor-suppressor/. Lab-created aberrations and/or inclusions and/or alterations to the p53 protein, the “Guardian of the Genome”, impacts the influence of human Chromosome 19; and are particularly injurious to the entire body.

**** It appears, then, that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” interact with both the p53 protein AND human chromosome 19 to induce cancers in “vaccinated” persons; and, that the SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter gene code piece that is ALSO in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” is also involved regarding the inducement of cancer in “vaccinated” persons.

Which brings Yours Truly to this, a paper proving the first DIRECT evidence of human Chromosome 19 being altered by the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, which then induce Stage IV bladder cancer: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-study-first-direct-evidence, “BREAKING STUDY: First Direct Evidence of mRNA “Vaccine” Genomic Integration Identified in Stage IV Cancer Patient”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 15 September 2025. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:

Note regarding the above: the sequences identified which induced the Stage IV bladder cancer in the patient were contained within the Spike protein (S protein) of the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” that she took, not from within the Nucleocapsid protein (N protein.)

The young woman in question took THREE injections of the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” (mRNA-1273) during 2021 (the “primary series” plus one “booster shot.”) She was diagnosed with Stage IV bladder cancer within twelve months.

The paper is on the preprint server, Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/records/17122912, “Genomic Integration and Molecular Dysregulation in Aggressive Stage IV Bladder Cancer Following COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination”, John A. Catanzano, Nicolas Hulscher, Peter A. McCullough, 15 September 2025. Please see the following screenshots from this paper; first, Table 1. from the Case Presentation. Table 1. outlines the exact “drivers” and “pathways” that established the bladder cancer in the previously-healthy 31-year-old patient after she took the three Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” injections:

Second, from the Case Presentation in the paper. Please note the mention that numerous human Chromosome 19 alterations induced by the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” EXACTLY MATCH the same Open Reading Frame (ORF) sequences in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” (BNT162b2):

Which means that the alterations to human Chromosome 19 in BOTH the Moderna AND the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” occur within the Open Reading Frame of the spike protein (S protein.) This chromosome altering capability is thus then present in all “descendant modRNA COVID-19 vaccines” from these companies, including the “2025-2026 version” of Pfizer-BioNTech (COMIRNATY) and of Moderna (SPIKEVAX), since said “descendant COVID-19 vaccines” all employ the S protein from the original COMIRNATY or SPIKEVAX injectables.

From the Discussion section of the paper. Please read the screenshot below carefully. This is a description of how the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” induce TURBO-CANCER:

**** What we have here is proof that the oncogenic driver known as human Chromosome 3q26.32, Gene PIK3CA — was included in the modRNA of the Moderna COVID-19 “vaccine” mRNA-1273. Please see the Catanzano, et al., paper cited above: the Table 1., and the Discussion screenshots; and, also, the OMIM Phenotype – Gene Relationships table cited further down in today’s offering (though the OMIM table refers to colorectal cancer, PIK3CA is a driver for other cancers, also.

**** However, there is another element in play here: the Wuhan Hu1 virus itself (aka the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself / the COVID-19 virus itself) ALSO targets and attacks human Chromosomes: in particular, Chromosomes 3, 6, 12, 19, and 21. Please see this paper from December 2020, regarding a study performed on patients in the UK who were sick from the COVID-19 virus itself: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-03065-y, “Genetic mechanisms of critical illness in COVID-19”, Erola Pairo-Castineira, et al., 11 December 2020. Two screenshots from this paper are below; first, from the general introduction:

Compare the references to human Chromosome 19p13.2 and human Chromosome 19p13.3 in the Liebert Chromosome 19 Disease Map graphic above in today’s offering. This is proof that those who lab-created the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself , and those who lab-created the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, did experiment with human Chromosome 19 in order to include aberrations to areas of this chromosome that could result in negative health outcomes BOTH for persons infected with the virus itself, and for persons who took the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.”

And, Table 1 from the above paper:

Note: 11 December 2020 was the date of the initial Emergency Use Authorization for the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” BNT162b2 to be used in the United States. Given that it takes months for a scientific paper to be researched, written, and published, one can assume that the Pairo-Castineira, et al., paper, was begun several months before the 11 December 2020 publish date. Note: There are FOUR identified areas on human Chromosome 6 that are attacked by the COVID-19 virus itself.

This paper, from 2014, describes the multiple health conditions and diseases that are associated with alterations to / deletions involving, human Chromosome 6: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2013.08.001, “The Human Proteome Organization Chromosome 6 Consortium: Integrating Chromosome-centric and biology/disease driven strategies”, P.A. Keown, et al., 4 April 2014. Please see the screenshot, below, from the Introduction of this paper:

From https://www.storymd.com/, the “Ideogram of human chromosome 6“, which lists the multiple health conditions and diseases associated with aberrations of / alterations to / deletions of, parts of human Chromosome 6. The ideogram is courtesy of the Office of Biological and Environmental Research of the U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory:

Yours Truly firmly believes that, since human Chromosome 6 is also attacked by the SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19) virus itself; and, since the COVID-19 virus itself is the foundational element within all of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” — that these “vaccines”, once injected into the body, can and will attack the human Chromosome 6 of the “vaccinated” person’s body, along with attacking human Chromosomes 3, 12, 19, and 21.

Yours Truly firmly believes that those who lab-created the COVID-19 virus itself, and the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, experimented with human Chromosomes 3, 6, 12, 19, and 21, in order to introduce aberrations / mechanisms into them that could induce or aggravate health conditions and/or diseases that would not otherwise appear in healthy persons, then included the results of these experiments in both the virus itself, and in the modRNA “vaccines.

Yours Truly firmly believes that those who lab-created the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” then added the dangerous lipid nanoparticles (ALC-0159, ALC-0315, SM-102), and N1-Methylpseudouridine, to these “vaccines” to evade the human body’s immune system, to damage / destroy the human body’s immune system, and to damage / destroy the human body’s ability to detect and eliminate “enemy elements”, in order to force the “vaccinated” body to be defenseless to the negative effects of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” Thus, there are reports of, for example, Diabetes Mellitus resulting from modRNA COVID-19 “vaccination” by the Pfizer-BioNTech “vaccine”, BNT162b2, in this document: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST section.

FLASH! Yours Truly has just found more proof, in her opinion, regarding the experiments on human Chromosomes by those who lab-created the COVID-19 virus itself, and by those who lab-created the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”. Please see, first: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2025/10/16/8300-spike-in-colon-cancer-that-just-means-the-jabs-are-working/, “8300% SPIKE IN COLON CANCER — THAT JUST MEANS THE JABS ARE WORKING”, by Camus. A screenshot from this article is below:

The Burning Platform article is based on the recent research by Dr. Jessica Rose, PhD, of VAERS reports of colon cancer since 2021 (rollout of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.”) She posted a blog article regarding her analysis, here: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/colon-cancer-on-the-rise-since-2021, 7 September 2025. The huge increase in colon cancer since 2021, per the VAERS reports, appears to be in children under age 18.

Please refer to the human Chromosome Disease Maps, and the screenshots from the 2020 paper of COVID-19 infected persons in the UK, above in today’s offering, regarding human Chromosome 3 and human Chromosome 19.

BOTH human Chromosome 3 AND human Chromosome 19 (among other chromosomes) show up on the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man listing for #114500 COLORECTAL CANCER: CRC Phenotype – Gene Relationships: https://www.omim.org/entry/114500. The human Chromosomes that correlate to the COVID-19 virus itself, and therefore to the COVID-19 modRNA “vaccines”, are:

human Chromosome 3p22.1 Gene: CTNNB1 Colorectal cancer, somatic

human Chromosome 3q26.32 Gene: PIK3CA Colorectal cancer, somatic

human Chromosome 19q13.33 Gene: BAX Colorectal cancer, somatic

NONE of the above are inherited “predispositions.”

The OMIM table is below:

In Yours Truly’s opinion, there is no possible way that the detailed, precise experiments that had to have been performed with human Chromosomes 3, 6, 12, 19, and 21, in the lab-creation of the COVID-19 virus itself, and in the lab-creation of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, could have been accomplished just during the years 2019 – 2020. This is a process that would need several years of work, at the least.

Questions: What kind of POMC (Pieces of Human Excrement) would lab-create a virus, let alone a modRNA “vaccine”, that would induce colon cancer in anyone, let alone in children? What kind of medical professional would inject this type of “vaccine” into children? What kind of government agency would “recommend” that this type of “vaccine” be injected into anyone, let alone into children? What kind of “professional medical organization” (such as, the American Academy of Pediatrics) would “recommend” that this type of “vaccine” be injected into children?

IT IS OF UTMOST IMPORTANCE THAT ALL PERSONS BUILD AND MAINTAIN THEIR NATURAL IMMUNE SYSTEM TO BE IN THE BEST HEALTH POSSIBLE.

THE COVID-19 “VACCINES” — ALL OF THEM — MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE MARKET AND FROM USE. NOW.

THE ARRESTS OF THOSE WHO WERE / ARE INVOLVED IN THE ABOVE ACTIVITIES REGARDING THE LAB-CREATION OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS ITSELF, AND OF THE modRNA COVID-19 “VACCINES”, MUST START. NOW.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Intellectual Property Disclaimer: With the exception of links to scientific papers, public-domain scientific research or information websites, and news / media / Substack outlets that are on the internet, the contents of the above article are the ideas and/or conclusions of the writer, PAVACA. Proper credit must be given to the writer (PAVACA) if the ideas and/or conclusions in the above article are used by any other blog author or writer, or by persons on social media and/or on podcasts, or by persons using print media. Thank you.

Health Friday 10.10.2025 Open Thread: A Letter to Dr. Martin Makary, FDA Commissioner

The free vintage header image of writing a letter for today’s offering is courtesy of Shutterstock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Today’s offering is dedicated to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have suffered negative consequences from an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself after recovering from the infection; to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced injuries, illnesses, and/or disabilities; and, to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from either an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself, or from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” they had in their body.

“Dr. Martin Makary, MD, MPH, Commissioner, United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD, 20993

Dear Dr. Martin Makary:

Greetings. This letter is in reference to certain questions that the writer poses regarding the FDA, under your leadership, still promoting the use of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (actually, mRNA gene therapies) in the United States. This includes the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” COMIRNATY, by Pfizer-BioNTech; the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” SPIKEVAX and NEXSPIKE, by Moderna; and, the “inactivated virus” COVID-19 “vaccine” NUVAXOVID, by Novavax. Thank you in advance for your attention. The questions follow:

Question One: Have you read through the report on BNT162b2 that Pfizer-BioNTech submitted to the FDA on 21 January 2021, regarding the Pharmacokinetics tests results for this modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” (which was subsequently approved by the FDA in 2022 under the name COMIRNATY)?

Would you please answer, in detail, your reasoning behind the continued FDA approval of COMIRNATY based on the results of this report? The report is found here: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M2_26_phramkin-tabulated-summary.pdf, “BNT162b2 2.6.5 Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary”, time-stamped by the FDA on 21 January 2021 at 23:22 (GMT), and starting with FDA CBER document identification number FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0013907. For your convenience, images of Page 7 and Page 8 of this report are below; first, Page 7:

And, Page 8:

The writer of this letter assumes that you understand that the BNT162b2 formulation used in the Wistar lab rats experiments above is the same formulation that the FDA granted the initial EUA to for use in the United States on 11 December 2020.

Question Two: Have you read through the Post-marketing Experience report on BNT162b2 that Pfizer-BioNTech submitted to the FDA on 30 April 2021? In particular, have you read through the APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST section of this report, which begins on Page 30? The report is found here: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, “BNT162b2 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports”, time-stamped by the FDA on 30 April 2021 at 09:26 (GMT), starting with FDA CBER document identification number FDA-CBER-2021-0000054. The APPENDIX 1. section covers only those serious adverse events reports to Pfizer-BioNTech that were submitted between 11 December 2020 (the date that the FDA granted the initial EUA for BNT162b2 to be used in the United States), and 28 February 2021 — a period of fewer than 12 weeks. There are over 1,200 different listings of serious adverse events reports in the APPENDIX 1. section of the document.

Would you please answer, in detail, your reasoning behind the continuing FDA approval of COMIRNATY, given this document? Would you please answer, in detail, your reasoning why the FDA would simply accept this document without demanding an investigation of why there are so many different serious adverse events reports for BNT162b2? For you convenience, an image of Page one of the APPENDIX 1. section (Page 30 of the report document) is below:

The APPENDIX 1. section of the report runs from Page 30 to Page 38.

Question Three: Have you read the paper, published in the journal Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology on 15 September 2021, in which the authors prove that both the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” of Pfizer-BioNTech and of Moderna, and the viral vector COVID-19 “vaccines” (for example, of Janssen), cross the placenta of a COVID-19 “vaccinated” pregnant woman and enter into the body and brain of the fetus she is carrying? And, that, similarly, these “vaccines” also cross into the breast milk of the nursing mother who was “vaccinated”, therefore also entering into her nursling’s body and brain? The paper is found here: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.735394, “COVID-19 Vaccination in Pregnancy and Lactation: Current Research and Gaps in Understanding”, Lydia L. Shook, Parisa N. Fallah, Jason N. Silberman, Andrea G. Edlow, 15 September 2021. For your convenience, a screenshot of Figure 1 from the paper is below:

Which means, according to the graphic above from the paper, that the fetus and the nursling will get COVID-19 “vaccinated” along with the mother, due to the ingredients and mechanisms that cross into the placenta and/or the breast milk from the “vaccinated” mother. The natural immune systems of a fetus or of a nursling child are not mature enough, or strong enough, to handle the antibody-manufacturing demands of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that involuntarily enter their body and brain via the “vaccinated” mother.

Would you please describe, in detail, your reasoning for the FDA continuing to recommend COVID-19 “vaccination” of pregnant women, and/or breastfeeding mothers, based on the Frontiers In paper report?

Question Four: Are you aware that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna, contain N1-Methylpseudouridine, a lab-created compound, that replaces the natural RNA in the Uridine of the “vaccinated” person’s body with this compound? Are you aware that N1-Methylpseudouridine was specifically created and included in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” because this lab-created compound facilitates the entry of the ingredients of these “vaccine” into every cell of the “vaccinated” person’s body? Are you aware that, by replacing the RNA of the natural Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body, the multiple beneficial functions of Uridine RNA are damaged or lost? Are you aware that, among the multiple beneficial functions of Uridine RNA include cognitive elements (learning, memory), and emotional/psychological elements (mood regulation?) Are you aware that N1-Methylpseudouridine is present in all COVID-19 “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech? For your convenience, please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2024/11/08/health-friday-11-8-2024-open-thread-the-insidious-n1-methylpseudouridine-in-the-covid-19-vaccines/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2025/03/21/health-friday-3-21-2025-open-thread-more-on-the-n1-methylpseudouridine-in-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines/. The Patent Declaration by Pfizer-BioNTech for BNT162b2, which describes the inclusion of N1-Methylpseudouridine in this “vaccine”, and what it does, is found here: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2021213945A1/en. For reference, the following screenshot is from this Patent Declaration:

Would you please explain, in detail, your reasoning behind why the FDA should continue to approve for use in the United States, an injectable (the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”) that specifically includes a lab-created compound (N1-Methylpseudouridine) which replaces natural Uridine RNA — and that this replacement is performed without the advance knowledge and consent of the person receiving this “vaccine?”

Question Five: The writer of this letter assumes that you, Dr. Makary, are aware that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” induce cardiovascular issues and conditions, such as, myocarditis and pericarditis. This would mean induction of these conditions by the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” (COMIRMATY); or, by the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” (SPIKEVAX.) The writer of this letter will focus on the Moderna product. The Package Insert for the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, SPIKEVAX, is found here: https://www.fda.gov/media/155675/download. For your convenience, screenshots of the the following portions of this document are below; first, the Warnings and Precautions section:

The writer of this letter notes that the Warnings and Precautions are not enclosed in a “Black Box Warning.” Why is this the case?

Then, from section 5.2 Myocarditis and Pericarditis:

And, from section 6.2 Postmarketing Experience:

There actually is information available regarding the potential for long-term sequelae of myocarditis or pericarditis after taking COVID-19 “vaccines.” It is here: https://doi.org/10.61577/ijcri.2025.100001, “Myocarditis after SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Vaccination: Epidemiology, outcomes, and new perspectives”, M. Nathaniel Mead, Jessica Rose, William Makis, Kirk Milhoan, Nicolas Hulscher, and Peter A. McCullough, 20 March 2025. For your convenience, a screenshot of the Abstract of this paper is below:

And, Figure 6 from the paper, VAERS reports of myocarditis after COVID-19 “vaccination”:

Would you please describe, in detail, your reasoning why the FDA needs to continue to promote the use of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” in the United States, for any age group, based on the paper above?

Finally, Question Six: Would you please describe, in detail, what medical school and/or Residency classes you took in which you learned that it was acceptable for patients to be given injections of an mRNA gene therapy treatment platform (in this case, the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”) without that injectable first having gone through a rigorous testing and analysis protocol beforehand?

Sincerely,

An independent COVID-19 researcher for the past five and a half years.”

The COVID-19 “vaccines” — ALL of them — must be removed from the market and from use. Now.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 10.3.2025 Open Thread: The Continuing Disaster of COVID-19: “Set Pieces”

The free image of an example of a theatrical set piece is courtesy of Study.com/ and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks to the disaster of COVID-19, it is dedicated to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have suffered illness, injury, disability, or death from either an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself; or, from illness, injury, disability, or death, induced by the COVID-19 “vaccines” that were injected into their body.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content; to the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post AI-generated content in the discussion thread of today’s offering, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Today’s offering follows a different path.

In the performing arts world, a “set piece” is a detailed design for a production. Set pieces are designed for plays, for musical theater productions, for movies, for dance or ballet productions, for opera and other large Classical music productions, and so on. Set pieces can be elaborate, or they can be “bare-bones” simple. Sometimes, there are multiple set pieces created for the production; sometimes, there are only one or two set pieces; sometimes, set pieces are built on revolving stage areas and are “rotated” according to the scene or act in the production; sometimes, extra items, such as water (in pools, as waterfalls, etc.) are incorporated into a set piece (think Esther Williams swimming movies); and so on. However, the set piece (or, set pieces) all serve to help the framework of the production and the intention behind the plot, script, or and/or music of the work. And, set pieces are designed — in almost all cases, they are not “thrown together” at the last minute; one exception is the performance of pure “improv” (improvisation; many improv performances use props only, not set pieces.)

Examples of performing arts “set pieces” of various types are below:

From Giacomo Puccini’s opera, Tosca, the final scene, in which Tosca leaps to her death from the parapets of the Castel Sant’Angelo to escape capture after she killed her tormentor, Baron Scarpia. Courtesy of the Metropolitan Opera, 2024-2025 season:

Yours Truly will note that the “other side” of the Castel Sant’Angelo set piece has multiple layers of foam pads, trained stage technicians, and first-aid personnel on hand to make quite sure that the singer playing Tosca lands safely. The “leap scene” rehearsal related to the Metropolitan Opera 2024 – 2025 season production is on video, here: https://www.facebook.com/MetOpera/videos/puccini-tosca-jump-rehearsal/568495235373588/.

An example of a water “set piece” from the Esther Williams 1952 movie, Million Dollar Mermaid. Courtesy loveletterstooldhollywood.blogspot.com/:

A set piece from a performance of Samuel Becket’s stage play, Waiting for Godot. Courtesy of Wikipedia:

“Set Pieces” in the COVID-19 disaster:

In the COVID-19 disaster, there have been well-designed, elaborate “set pieces” employed, such as: the “mandating” of lockdowns; the “universal masking”; the deliberate withholding of important information from then-President Donald Trump 45 regarding the ingredients and mechanisms of the COVID-19 “vaccines” in development during “Operation Warp Speed; the subsequent rollout of the COVID-19 “vaccines”; the marginalizing and ostracizing of those who had any reservations about the “safety and efficacy” of these “vaccines”; the persecution / prosecution / loss of medical licenses, of those who began to investigate and to write about the dangers and deadliness of these “vaccines” — for only a few examples. These “set pieces” affected millions of people, who were coerced and/or gaslighted-frightened into being “actors” (such as, standing six feet away from other persons; “following the science” and taking multiple injections of COVID-19 “vaccines”.) Others were labelled as “anti-vaxxers” because they refused to take the “vaccines.” All were, at the same time, also forced to be “spectators” (watching their children suffer from not being able to attend school during the “lockdowns”; losing jobs, family relationships, friends, and colleagues; watching COVID-19 “vaccinated” loved ones, friends, and colleagues begin to succumb to COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced injuries, illnesses, disabilities, or death.)

It appears that new “set pieces” regarding the COVID-19 “vaccines” in the United States are being created and put into place. One such new “set piece” involves, among other items, the 19 September 2025 ACIP “recommendation” that COVID-19 “vaccine” administration be restricted to persons age 65 and over; and, to persons who are deemed to be at “high risk of severe complications from a COVID-19 infection”, as per the FDA’s “new approach”, outlined here: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb2506929, “An Evidence-Based Approach to Covid-19 Vaccination”, Martin Makary, MD MPH, and Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH, published 20 May 2025. Figure 2 from this “opinion piece”, which lists the populations of Americans at “high risk”, and should therefore take a COVID-19 “vaccine”, is below. Note: the age 65 and older category is already “assumed” to be a high risk:

The CDC’s ACIP group “recommendations” from the September 2025 meeting are summarized here: https://www.hhw.gov/press-room/acip-recommends-covid-19-vaccination-individual-decision-making.html. A screenshot from this article is below:

However, “individual decision-making” runs counter to what “Establishment Medicine” organizations, such as the AMA, advises physicians to do. For example, in the AMA podcast interview with Sean O’Leary, MD, published 30 April 2025, found here: https://edhub.ama-assn-org/jn-learning/audio-player/18969411, “Strategies for Talking With Parents About Vaccines.” This audio interview is a must-listen. Dr. O’Leary describes the AMA “talking points” regarding pushing “vaccination” for young children (including newborns) along the lines of “presumptive” (“your child is due now to have X vaccines”) discussion with parents, as opposed to “participatory” (“what do you think about vaccination?”) discussion with parents. Dr. O’Leary makes it clear that “presumptive” discussion results in more agreement from the parents to have their young children “vaccinated.” Dr. O’Leary also speaks about “pre-bunking”, the process of minimizing / dismissing “vaccine misinformation” or “vaccine disinformation” from “anti-vaxxers”; instead, the physician is urged to “steer” the “vaccine”-hesitant or “vaccine”-questioning parent to “trusted websites” like the ones from the AAP (American Academy of Pediatrics, which endorses “vaccination” of all kinds for children, including from birth, and including the COVID-19 “vaccines.”) In fact, the American Academy of Pediatrics https://www.aap.org/ has issued its own “recommended childhood vaccine schedule”, in contravention to the revised Childhood Immunization Schedule of the CDC. Below are screenshots of the “AAP recommended vaccines”, the “AAP recommended vaccination schedule”, and, the “AAP recommended vaccination schedule by medical condition”, below:

Note that the COVID-19 “vaccines” are “recommended” by the AAP for all children ages 6 months and older — for healthy children; for immunocompromised children; and, for children with heart disease, and other medical conditions.

Another “set piece” was added this week: the email from Jack Leeming, an “editor” at the journal Nature, that he sent to selected blog authors at Substack. These blog authors work every day to investigate and write about the dangers and deadliness of the COVID-19 “vaccines.” Among the blog authors contacted by Jack Leeming are: Sasha Latypova; Alex Berenson; and, Dr. Peter A. McCulloug, MD. In this email, Leeming is requesting their “input” before Nature publishes a “hit piece” on them. Apparently, this “hit piece” will try to do the following:

Defame Substack blog authors who are doing all they can to spread the actual truth about the dangers and deadliness of the COVID-19 “vaccines”;

Pressure Substack into imposing “content moderation” (translation: censorship) of these blogs;

Pressure Substack into “de-monetizing” these blogs.

Pressure Substack into showcasing “COVID-19 vaccine friendly” blogs.

Sasha Latypova wrote about the email she received from Leeming. Please see: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/journal-nature-is-planning-a-hit, “Journal Nature is planning a hit piece about me. This is my response to their “request for comment.””, 1 October 2025. A screenshot of Leeming’s email to her, via her blog article, is below:

Ms. Latypova’s reply, which is also in her article, takes Leeming and his email apart. A portion of her reply is in the screenshot below:

All of the above begs the questions: Who (and/or What) are in the “Control Booth” regarding the “set pieces” of the COVID-19 disaster? Who (and/or What) are telling those in the “Control Booth” what to do?

THE COVID-19 “VACCINES” — ALL OF THEM — MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE MARKET AND FROM USE. NOW.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 9.26.2025 Open Thread: More on Gain-of-Function Research is Still Going On — In the United States

The header image of a vintage laboratory for today’s offering is courtesy of Adobe Stock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except perhaps for AI-generated images embedded in certain links. If readers wish to post AI-generated content to the discussion thread of today’s offering, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Today’s offering contains more proof that, even though the United States government has “officially” paused Gain-of-Function experiments, these experiments are still continuing. Please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/08/29/health-friday-8-29-2025-open-thread-gain-of-function-research-is-still-going-on/. This time, there are two separate facilities in the United States that are performing the Gain-of-Function (GoF) work. The first is the new “bat experiments lab” at Colorado State University at Fort Collins, CO. The second is the laboratory at Georgia State University at Atlanta, GA. Bear with Yours Truly: the end of the post is the “punch line.” Yours Truly makes it clear at the start that there is no intent to “cast aspersions” on the research of any of the persons mentioned in today’s offering, or on the current Acting Director of the NIAID.

To begin, the Colorado State University facility. Please see: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2025/09/15/gain-of-function-is-alive-and-thriving-in-the-united-states/, by Patti Johnson, 9 September 2025. This regards a 14,000 square foot “bat research facility” that was added to an already-exiting research lab building at Colorado State University (CSU.) The majority of the funding for this “bat research lab”, $6.7 million dollars, came from NIH grant C06OD032019 (https://source.colostate.edu/csu-awarded-6-7-million-nih-award-for-research-facility-focused-on-bat-health-disease-transmission/, 7 October 2021. CSU already had a 38,000 square foot research facility in which the university had invested $22 million dollars, and which had opened in 2020: https://cvmbs.source.colostate.edu/more-than-a-building-the-center-for-vector-borne-infectious-diseases-marks-a-new-era-in-research/, 11 December 2020 (which, by the way, is the same date that the FDA granted the initial Emergency Use Authorization for the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” BNT162b2 to be used in the United States.) In “The Center for Vector Borne Infectious Diseases” at CSU, the professors “mix in” with students in the labs. This facility has 10 labs and employs more than 90 personnel. The labs are all BSL-2 labs. This situation, in and of itself, raises two questions: One, why are students allowed to “mix in” with the professors in these labs? And, Two, if these labs are handling / experimenting with, infectious diseases pathogens, why are the labs only BSL-2 safety level? Please see: https://ghphipps.com/colorado-state-university-center-for-vector-borne-infectious-disease/. A screenshot from this article is below:

GH Phipps was the construction company for the facility.

However, the “new bat research facility” is the separate 14,000 square foot building: https://yellowscene.com/2024/09/19/csu-to-build-taxpayer-funded-facility-for-bat-breeding-and-research/, 19 September 2024. This was the facility built with the NIH grant of $6.7 million dollars. This building is located here: 3105 Rampart Rd., Ft. Collins, CO, 5 minutes from downtown Fort Collins.

And, guess what? The “new bat research facility” in Fort Collins also has BSL-2 level labs: A screenshot from the Yellow Scene article is below:

The entire situation at CSU raises other questions: One, will professors ALSO “mix in” with students at this “bat breeding and research” facility? And, Two, why is CSU attempting to be the “United States version” of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which is what the “new bat research facility” at CSU appears to be?

And, now, turning to the second issue, the continuing Gain-of-Function experiments with Avian Influenza viruses going on in the United States —- this time, at Georgia State University in Atlanta. Please see: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/us-and-south-korean-scientists-lab, “U.S. and South Korean Scientists Lab-Engineer Frankenstein Bird Flu Viruses in Georgia: Journal ‘Virology'”. 14 September 2025. The GoF experiments at GSU, supported by an NIH grant, were performed by South Korean scientists who are ALSO be professors at Georgia State University, with a couple of said professors ALSO having ties to South Korean institutions. Yours Truly will also present **interesting information** regarding the scope of this research at GSU by one particular author of the paper just cited. Please see the screenshot below, from the Fleetwood article:

The paper cited in the Fleetwood article is here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2025.110674, “Interferon-y receptor signaling is critical for balanced immune activation and protection against influenza after vaccination”, Sang-Moo Kang, et al., 6 September 2025. A screenshot of the list of the paper’s authors and their affiliations is below, from the paper itself:

Note that the TITLE of the paper does NOT mention what type of influenza was the study subject (in this case, it was Avian Influenza.) More on this aspect later on in today’s offering.

Following are screenshots from sections of the paper that are available online. Note: the entire paper is available only through institutional access, or through paid access.

From the Introduction of the paper:

And, the from the funding section of the paper:

The NIH grant went to Sang-Moo Kang, the principal investigator. Please see: https://www.gsu.edu/2021/06/04/biomedical-sciences-researcher-gets-2-7-million-federal-grant-to-study-seasonal-and-universal-vaccination-in-aged-populations/. This was the NIH grant AI154656 cited above. A screenshot of this article is below — in its entirety, as there are several “clues” in it:

Note the “clues”: “universal vaccination”; aged populations”; “multiple influenza proteins”; “translational science”; “cross protective efficacy.” However, the “multiple influenza proteins” that were experimented with in the paper cited above were not regular “seasonal flu viruses” — they were strains of H5N1, the Avian Influenza virus.

It appears that Dr. Kang has also used some of the AI154656 NIH grant on other research and papers, such as for this paper: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127206, “Intranasal vaccination with multi-neuraminidase and M2e virus-like particle vaccine results in greater mucosal immunity and protection against influenza than intramuscular injection”, Sang-Moo Kang, et al., Version of Record 7 May 2025. Again, this is “Dr. Kang and his gang” at work; the exception here is that the researchers for this paper are all affiliated only with Georgia State University. And, again, the entire paper is available only through institutional access or through paid access. Keep in mind the emphasis of the paper on “intranasal vaccine delivery.”

This particular paper is the result of Dr. Kang’s, et al., research using another “mixture” of influenza viruses — H1N1 (“swine flu”, a subtype of Influenza A), plus H3N2 (a non-human influenza virus in pigs that can infect humans, https://oklahoma.gov/health/health-education/acute-disease-service/disease-information/influenza-a-h3n2-variant-.html), plus H5N1 Avian Influenza. Screenshots from the “snippets” of this paper that are available online are below: the Abstract; a portion of the Viruses section; and, a portion of the Acknowledgements section:

It appears that the paper purports to prove that the intranasal method of “vaccine delivery” is superior to the current intramuscular (injection) method. It is also clear that experiments that were performed were Gain-of-Function work — this time, combining various Influenza A subtypes (“swine flu” that infects humans; “swine flu” that can infect humans; and, Avian Influenza); plus, Influenza B. It is also clear that these experiments were designed to have maximum effect on the CD4 – CD8 cells and the IgG system. By the way, neuraminidase is an important component in the spread of influenza virus in human lungs. Interferon-y (IFN-y) is an element that is important in the regulation of immune and inflammatory responses, among other functions.

**** There is one more paper by “Dr. Kang and Gang” at GSU that bears scrutiny; this one, published in July 2024: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50087-5, “Enhancing cross-protection against influenza by heterologous sequential immunization with mRNA LNP and protein nanoparticle vaccines”, Sang-Moo Kang, et al., 10 July 2024. This paper describes Gain-of-Function experiments not only with various influenza viruses (H3N2 and H7N9 [H7N9 is an Avian Influenza virus that is particularly lethal to humans who get infected with it]); it also describes what can only be Gain-of-Function experiments with “delivery methods” for the TWO different kinds of influenza “vaccines” that use EITHER lipid nanoparticles, OR use PHC (a protein-based nanoparticle.) Several screenshots from this paper are below, starting with the Abstract; then, Figure 1.; followed by a portion of the Discussion section:

The LNPs (lipid nanoparticles) used in the “mRNA initial series vaccine” in the experiments in the above paper are: DOTMA (cationic lipid, used in gene therapies, enhances gene transfection); DOPE (enhances intracellular “delivery” of the “vaccine” ingredients); and, DMG-PEG2000 (nanoparticle version of polyethylene glycol; one of the two LNPs in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, the other being SM-102.)

It appears that this paper describes how a “multi-delivery method” of a 2-injection series of a modRNA influenza “vaccine”, followed by a 1-dose “booster” of an intranasal modRNA influenza “vaccine”, is the “optimal” method for “cross-protection” against infection.

The “PUNCH LINE” section of today’s offering follows:

**** In fact, it appears that the above paper claims that modRNA influenza “vaccine” intramuscular injection (IM injection) is now to be considered as “priming the pump” for the subsequent use of modRNA intranasal delivery of the influenza “vaccine” in order to have “sufficient protection” against infection. In other words — TWO types of “delivery methods” need to used.

The above paper was funded by NIH grants R01AI101047 and R01AI143844 to “Dr. Kang and Gang” researcher Bao-Zhong Wang. Dr. Wang, by the way, seems to be from Communist China, having earned his PhD from the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2003.

Which brings Yours Truly back to the “Broadly Protective Influenza Vaccine” Patent that is owned by Dr. Jeffery Taubenberger, a “career employee” of the NIH who is now the Acting Director of the NIAID. Yours Truly has written about this scientist in the Health Friday offering of 29 August 2025, cited above in today’s offering. This is the “Universal Influenza Vaccine” that Dr. Taubenberger developed at the NIH: https://www.techtransfer.nih.gov/tech/tab-3388, “Broadly Protective Influenza Vaccine Comprising a Cocktail of Inactivated Avian Influenza Viruses”, published 6 July 2020. A screenshot from this page is below:

Note the “intranasally or intramuscularly” in the above statement.

The Patent declaration document for the above “Universal Influenza Vaccine” is here: https://image-ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/11369675, filed 21 July 2020. The title of the Patent is the same as that of the NIH TechTransfer information cited above.

All of the foregoing appears to point in the direction of a “universal influenza vaccine” that includes various types of influenza viruses (“swine flu”; Avian influenza; Influenza B); that would require at least three doses of a “vaccine” to have “sufficient protection”; and, that the “delivery methods” of the three doses appears to be 2 intramuscular injections of a modRNA plus cationic lipid nanoparicles “vaccine” to “prime the pump”, plus 1 “booster dose” of an intranasal modRNA plus PHC-nanoparticle “vaccine” to “provide sufficient protection” from infection. And, that this situation is being “influenced”, so to speak, by the “new direction” of the NIAID, led by Acting Director Dr. Jeffery Taubenberger.

One must ask: Why is there so much emphasis on a “universal influenza vaccine” that combines elements of “swine flu” viruses, of various Avian Influenza viruses, and, of the Influenza B virus? Why is there an emphasis on “aged populations” in the Gain-of-Function experiments described above in today’s offering?

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 9.19.2025 Open Thread: Remove the COVID-19 “Vaccines” from the Market and from Use. Now.

The free header image for today’s offering is courtesy of Dreamstime.com/ and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks of the disaster of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (Bioweapon Toxin Injections), Yours Truly dedicates it to all those persons who have taken these “vaccines” and have since suffered injuries, illnesses, or disabilities, resulting from them; and, to the memory of all those persons who have taken these “vaccines” but who then passed away due to their deleterious effects. The foregoing is not a kind of “boilerplate” — it is to help ensure that those who have suffered from taking these “vaccines” are not forgotten.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except perhaps for AI-generated images in certain of the linked URLs in the post. If readers wish to post AI-generated content in the discussion thread for today’s offering, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Yours Truly begins here: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2025/09/07/the-massive-covid-vaccine-deception/, “THE MASSIVE COVID VACCINE DECEPTION”, by Camus. Please see the screenshots below of portions of the statements by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.:

“For the first six weeks, the vaccine is ineffective.” Not so fast. The following is proof that the COVID-19 “vaccines” are “effective” — not in the “official government statements” ways (“prevention of COVID-19”; “reducing risk of severe infection and death from COVID-19”, etc.), but instead in the multiple negative ways in which these injectables were designed to be, and are still designed to be, from the moment they are injected into a person’s body. Please note: the list below is not exhaustive. The following are examples of what may be termed the “Actual Efficacy” of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”:

They kill: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/new-analysis-of-the-czech-covid-vaccines, “New analysis of the Czech COVID vaccine data reveals that the mRNA shots were deadly for all ages. They should be pulled from the market.”, 28 August 2025. Please see the screenshot from this article, below, which shows that death occurred in COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons in the Czech Republic within a month after said “vaccination“:

The death rates from COVID-19 “vaccination” began to rise on 1 June 2021, the start date of the statistical analysis timefrane on the chart above.

They cause myocarditis and/or pericarditis among the COVID-19 “vaccinated“: The “primary source material” proof on this situation is furnished by Pfizer-BioNTech itself — the BNT162b2 Post-authorization report that the company gave to the FDA on 30 April 2021. The report is found here: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, “5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021”, by Worldwide Safety, Pfizer-BioNTech. The APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST section begins on Page 30 of this report. This section lists the 1,291 types of serious adverse events reported among persons who took BNT162b2 between 11 December 2020 (the date that the FDA granted the initial Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for this modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”), and the end of February 2021 — a span of only 79 days (11.2 weeks.) Please see Page 6 of the APPENDIX 1 section (Page 35 of the report), where “Myocarditis” listed; and, Page 7 of the same section (Page 36 of the report), where “Pericarditis” is listed. Screenshots of the salient portions of each page are below; first, of Page 6:

And, of Page 7:

They cause permanent alteration of the DNA of the LINE-1 cells of the COVID-19 “vaccinated” person’s body (this permanent alteration is accomplished within 48 hours after “vaccination”): Please see: https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44030073, “Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line”, Markus Alden, Yang De Marinis, et al., 22 February 2022. Figure 2 from this paper is below. BNT162b2 is reverse transcribed into LINE-1 human liver cells within 48 hours post-“vaccination”, resulting in permanent alteration of the DNA of these cells:

They cross the Blood-Brain Barrier and facilitate entry of the spike protein into the cerebral arteries: Please see https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111223, “Expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in cerebral Arteries: Implications for hemhorragic stroke Post-mRNA vaccination.”, Nakao Ota, et al., June 2025. A screenshot of the Highlights section of this paper is below:

They replace all of the RNA of the natural Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body with the lab-created compound, N1-Methylpseudouridine. This replacement “turns off” the functions of the natural Uridine. The N1-Methylpseudouridine then acts as a “facilitator” for the spread of the ingredients of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” throughout the body; and, via the vagus nerve (which natural Uridine helps to regulate the functions and mechanisms thereof), into the brain. Please see https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-51301-0, “N1-Methylpseudouridine and pseudouridine modifications modulate mRNA decoding during translation”, Kristin S Koutmou, et al., 16 September 2024. A screenshot of a portion of the Introduction of this paper is below:

“Substitute” the RNA of the Uridine is a fancy way of saying, “Destroys the RNA, then replaces it with N1-Methylpseudouridine.”

By the way, the “primary source document” regarding the fact that N1-Methylpseudouridine destroys all of the natural RNA of the Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body (along with details and descriptions of the other ingredients in BNT162b2, such as the inclusion of lipid nanoparticles) is found in the Worldwide Patent declaration for BNT162b2 by Pfizer-BioNTech. This document was published on 28 October 2021. It is found here: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2021213945A1/en, “CORONAVIRUS VACCINE”, by Pfizer-BioNTech. Click on “Download PDF” for the entire document.

They cause serious Central Nervous System (CNS) issues, since they cross the Blood-Brain Barrier: Multiple CNS issues result from modRNA COVID-19 “vaccination”; among them, new-onset Multiple Sclerosis. Again, the “primary source document” for this is the 5.3.6 Post-Authorization report cited above. Please see the salient portion of Page 6 of the APPENDIX 1. section of this report (Page 35 of the report), below:

Please also see: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2021.577785, “New diagnosis of multiple sclerosis in the setting of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine exposure”, Karlo Toljan, et al., 9 December 2021. A screenshot of section 3.2 Case 2 from this paper is below:

They accumulate COVID-19 “vaccine” ingredients (modRNA, spike protein, lipid nanoparticles, and all the other elements of this injectable) in every organ and area of the “vaccinated” body: Please see another “primary source document” from Pfizer-BioNTech regarding this situation. The document is found here: https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M2_26_pharmkin-tabulated-summary.pdf, “BNT162b2 2.6.5 Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary”, by Pfizer-BioBNTech. The company gave this document to the FDA on 21 January 2021. Page 7 and Page 8 of the document are below; first, Page 7:

And, Page 8:

Please note that these accumulations begin to occur within 30 minutes after injection with BNT162b2. Please also note that the formulation used in the Wistar lab rats experiments above is the same formulation that was granted the initial FDA Emergency Use Authorization for use in the United States on 11 December 2020; and was subsequently FDA-approved under the name COMIRNATY.

In terms of the “waning efficacy” of the COVID-19 “vaccines”: It was shown in the large Penn State University study of 2022 that COVID-19 “vaccine efficacy” wanes badly by the fifth month after “vaccination”; in fact, the “efficacy” begins to wane well before that. Please see https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y, “SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis”, Paddy Ssentengo, et al., 7 May 2022. A screenshot of the Results section of this paper is below:

VE = Vaccine Effectiveness

It is also known that the COVID-19 “vaccines” do not prevent COVID-19 infection; they do not prevent death from COVID-19 infection in “vaccinated” persons; they do not prevent the spread of the virus; and, that any “efficacy” from these injectables wanes almost completely well before seven months post-“vaccination.” In short, the COVID-19 “vaccines” are ineffective in what they were / are “officially” designed to do. On the other hand, these injectables are “effective” in causing “vaccine”-induced injuries, illnesses, disabilities, and death.

HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr.: All COVID-19 “vaccines” must be pulled off the market and removed from use. Now. There is no rational reason why these injectables are still being authorized, approved, or administered. The Amendment 12 to the PREP Act regarding COVID-19 Medical Countermeasures, signed by former HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra in December 2024, must be rescinded. Bring those who lab-created the COVID-19 “vaccines” brought to account. Get Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin C, Vitamin D, Azithromycin / Doxycycline, Zinc, NAC, and Quercetin all FDA-approved for prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection. Get these items made readily available to the general public and also to medical professionals.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 9.12.2025 Open Thread: Evil In Our Time

The free header image of a “swirl clock” for today’s offering is courtesy of 123RF and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Charlie Kirk, conservative activist, commentator, husband and father, was assassinated on Wednesday of this week (10 September 2025) as he was speaking at a “Prove Me Wrong” debate and rally at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. He was shot on the left side of his neck by a sniper who fired from approximately 200 yards away. It appears that the sniper’s single shot fired hit Mr. Kirk’s carotid artery. Mr. Kirk was pronounced dead at the hospital to which he was rushed after the hit. He leaves behind his wife, their two very young children, his parents, other relatives, and many friends. He leaves behind his work with Turning Point USA (TPUSA, of which he was the founder and chairman), and his other endeavors (his Salem Media Group talk show, his social media activities, and so on.) May Charlie Kirk rest in eternal Peace; and may the Almighty God sustain his widow and young children. May the assassin be found, along with those who recruited him. May Justice be meted out to them.

The cold-blooded, planned assassination of Charlie Kirk was Evil In Our Time. Make no mistake about this.

Today’s offering is not about the COVID-19 disaster: it is about the potential for a “new pandemic on the horizon”: H5N1 (Avian Influenza), another Evil In Our Time. Yours Truly has written about this situation in other Health Friday posts. Today’s post regards the latest Evil In Our Time news related to this issue: the lab-creation of TWO new chimeric types of H5N1 virus by the Chinese Communist government-owned company, Sinopharm. The first of these new, lab-created chimeric H5N1 viruses “attaches” to host cells at a rate 64 times higher than other strains of H5N1 viruses; the second of these new, lab-created chimeric H5N1 viruses has a “kill rate” of 100% in lab animals.

The story is here: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/china-lab-engineers-two-new-bird, “China Lab Engineers Two New Bird Flu Constructs: One Binds to Host Cells 64x Stronger, the Other is 100% Lethal in Mammals”, Jon Fleetwood, 8 September 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

The paper published by the Sinopharm scientists who performed the work is here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2025.110672, “H5N1 influenza virus-like particles based on BEVS induce robust functional antibodies and immune responses”, Yongbo Qiao, et al., 29 August 2025.

The Sinopharm scientists actually did two things: First, they lab-created two new, chimeric types of H5N1 virus that would guarantee either “attachment” to host cells at a rate 64 times higher than current H5N1 strains; or, would be lethal 100% of the time. Then, Second, they lab-created a “VLP-based vaccine” that would “induce robust functional antibodies and immune responses” to the said two new, chimeric H5N1 viruses. Please see the screenshots of the Abstract from this paper, and the Graphical Image from this paper, below:

Note that “Antigen presentation in lymph node” is the attack by these lab-created new, chimeric H5N1 viruses on the CD4 – CD8 T cells in the lymph nodes— the same things that the SARS-Cov-2 (COVID-19) virus itself, and the COVID-19 ‘vaccines”, do. Proper function of the CD4 – CD8 T cells is crucial to proper function of the human immune system in general.

This type of state-sponsored and state-funded Gain-of-Function work is Evil In Our Time. It’s not so much “the advancement of science.”

By the way, the Sinopharm lab where the work was performed is a BSL-3 lab — like the ones in many other bioweapons labs, and in university labs (like the Baric Lab at UNC, Chapel Hill.) http://en.sinopharm.com/2023-02/c_18829.html, 24 February 2023 (Sinopharm R&D webpage — be aware, it’s not secure.)

ALL GAIN-OF-FUNCTION WORK, NO MATTER WHERE IT IS PERFORMED, AND NO MATTER ON WHAT, MUST BE STOPPED. NOW. ALL EFFORTS TO MOUNT A “NEW PANDEMIC” OF H5N1, NO MATTER OF WHAT STRAIN, MUST BE STOPPED. NOW.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 9.5.2025 Open Thread: Human LINE-1, Chromosomes, and the modRNA COVID-19 “Vaccines”: Part One

The header image for today’s offering is courtesy of https://genesdev.cshlp.org/content/37/21-24/948.full, “LINE-1 retrotransposition and its regulation in cancers: implications for therapeutic opportunities”, Carlos Mendez-Dorantes, and Kathleen H. Burns, 13 December 2023.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks of the disaster of COVID-19 (the COVID-19 virus itself, and the COVID-19 “vaccines”), Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons, of whatever age or location: who have contracted a COVID-19 infection and recovered from it, but who also have residual complications from the infection; who have suffered COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced injury, illness, disability, or “Long COVID”; or, who have passed away, either from complications from an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself, or from COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced issues caused by these “vaccines” they had in their body.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except for perhaps some AI-generated images embedded in links cited in today’s offering. If readers wish to include any AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Today’s offering is Part One of two. It is not a lesson on human anatomy or on human genetics: it is a presentation of some of the most-recent information regarding the dangers and deadliness of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (Bioweapon Toxin Injections.) Yours Truly will emphasize at the start that more and more information that exposes these dangers and deadliness is coming out by the week — the “information trickle” of previous years regarding this situation is becoming a torrent. There is also information that potentially links some of the deleterious effects of the COVID- 19 “vaccines” back to the original Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself. Please bear with me: what may look like “diffuse parts” are all important pieces of the whole.

There is some “background information” that is necessary to “lay the groundwork” for the rest of today’s offering. Yours Truly begins here, with a paper by Ralph Baric, PhD, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, from 2006. The paper is found here: https://www.jcvi.org/sites/default/assets/projects/synthetic-genomics-options-for-governance/Baric-Synthetic-Viral-Genomics.pdf, “Synthetic Viral Genomics: Risks and Benefits for Science and Society”, Ralph S. Baric, PhD. In Yours Truly’s opinion, this paper can be viewed as a “blueprint” for the future Gain-of-Function (GoF) lab-experimentation with, and the lab-creation of, viruses such as the Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus; and the more-recent GoF experiments with strains of the H5N1 (Avian Influenza) virus. Please see the screenshots from Dr. Baric’s 2006 paper, below:

YT: Note the mentions, right at the start in the paper, about “biological warfare” and “biodefense.”

YT: The above images are from the Baric 2206 paper. Figure 4b appears to “outline” how to lab-create (Gain-of-Function work) of “synthetic coronavirus” genome codes.

Yours Truly will specially point out the passage above, “…data will provide detailed predictions regarding easy approaches to humanize zoonotic strains by retargeting the attachment proteins to recognize human, not the animal receptors (43-45).” This, in my opinion, is a direct “tie-in” to the gene code pieces from the Pangolin MP789 coronavirus that were used in the lab-creation of the original Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19 virus) itself — the same virus that is the foundation of all the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, including the “booster shots” and the “latest formula vaccines.” The MP789 coronavirus gene code has multiple “areas” that the human body can be receptive to — including the PRRAR / PRRARSV “backdoor key” to nucleus of every cell. Please see the following for more information about MP789 and its connection to the PRRARSV “backdoor key” that both the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna contain: https://www.theqtree.com/2023/05/01/pfizer-and-moderna-vaccines-both-contain-the-prrarsv-key-to-the-cell-nucleus/; https://www.theqtree.com/2024/11/22/health-friday-11-22-2024-open-thread-lets-talk-about-prrarsv-the-backdoor-key/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2024/11/27/placeholder-open-thread-11-27-2024-prrarsv-part-2-pangolin-edition/.

There is also something else of interest to point out regarding one of the References in the 2006 Baric paper: Reference 45. The referenced paper is found here: https://www.embopress.org/doi/full/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600640, “Receptor and viral determinants of SARS- coronavirus adaptation to human ACE2.”, Li, W., et al., 24 March 2005. This paper discusses the GoF experiments performed to determine and then lab-create elements of various rat and palm civet coronaviruses to the ACE2 receptor cells of humans. Recall that rat and civet coronaviruses experiments were performed at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the process of lab-creating the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself. Please see the screenshots from the paper, below. The first is from the authors’ “summary” a the top of the paper; the second is the end of the Discussion section of the paper:

Ralph Baric, PhD, was also working on the “cross-species adaptation and transmission” aspects of SARS- coronaviruses. For example, this paper: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2838128/, “Recombination, Reservoirs, and the Modular Spike: Mechanisms of Coronavirus Cross-Species Transmission”, Rachel L Graham, Ralph S Baric, 11 November 2009. The paper specifically discusses Spike 1 residues and ACE2 receptor cells in coronaviruses found in Himalayan palm civets; bats; and raccoon dogs — and the possibility that these coronaviruses can “leap” to humans.

And now, with the above as part of the context, Yours Truly presents LINE-1. First, via Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LINE1):

And, Second, from ActiveMotif (https://www.activemotif.com/blog-line-1, “LINE-1 Elements: Walk the LINE-1”, Michelle Tetrault Carlson, PhD, 13 September 2022):

LINE-1 cells are found throughout the human body. LINE-1 aberrations are involved in the following conditions: Genetic disease; cancers (lung; ovarian; bladder; colon; breast; brain [glioma]; and, liver.) LINE-1 aberrations / changes are also involved in aging and “aging related diseases” (per the article above, in the “LINE-1 and Aging” section.)

LINE-1 (also called L1) cells have been studied for some time; in particular, the association between L1 “retrotransposition” and disease. This is important in the context of what will be discussed next.

L1 cells can be “retrotransposed.” This will create “genetic instability.” Such retrotransposition can occur as an aberration resulting from genetic predisposition in the body. Please see: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00839-5, “Human L1 Retrotransposition Is Associated with Genetic Instability”, David E. Symer, et al., 9 August 2002. The Abstract from this paper is below:

This paper also discusses the role of SV40 in L1 retrotransposition. In addition, there is a section entitled, “L1 Is an Engine for Genetic Change.”

“Transposed” L1 cells can be involved in the establishment of cancers: https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.351051.123, “LINE-1 retrotransposition and its deregulation in cancers: implications for therapeutic opportunities”, Carlos Mendez-Dorantes, Kathleen H. Burns, 13 December 2023. Please see the screenshot from this paper (a graphical “process image” of L1 being “retrotransposed”), below:

The alarm bells have been ringing regarding the dangers of LINE-1 (L1) retrotranposition (“reverse transcription”) effect of the modCOVID-19 “vaccines” for some time. Examples: the “Maurol, et al.” paper of March 2022: https://www.hilarispublisher.com/articles/intracellular-reverse-transcription-of-covid19-mrna-vaccine-eminvitroem-in-human-cell-87770.html, “Intracellular Reverse Transcription of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine In-Vitro in Human Cell.”, Maurol, Luisette Mauro, Naseer Almukthar, Tarro Giulio, and Gamal abdul Hamid, et al., J Genet DNA Res6(2022):116. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:

YT: Note the mention of a timeframe of 5-10 years that is needed to study the effects of the “transcription activity.” Keep this in mind when reading the end of today’s offering.

Then, there is the “Alden, et al.” paper from April 2022: https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73, “Intracellular Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line”, Markus Alden, Yang De Marinis, et al., 11 April 2022. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below. The first is from the paper itself; the second, an image of the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 reverse transcription of DNA, is Slide 14 from the Doctors for COVID Ethics article (https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf, “Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality”, Michael Palmer, MD, and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD, August 2022):

And, the “Acevedo-Whitehouse and Bruno” paper from February 2023: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2023.111015, “Potential health risks of mRNA-based vaccine therapy: A hypothesis”, K. Acevedo-Whitehouse, R. Bruno, 6 February 2023. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below; the first is part of the Abstract; the second is the end of the Consequences and discussion section:

Which all lead to this, from Dr. Peter McCullough in May 2025: https://www.americaoutloud.news/genetic-bombshell-covid-19-vaccines-change-the-human-genome/, 24 May 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below. First, this one:

This harks back to the information that there are natural reasons for DNA alteration in a person’s body (for example, inherited genetic aberrations.) **** However, the issue here is the fact that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna contain ingredients and mechanisms that deliberately and permanently alter the DNA of the human LINE-1 cell lines of any person who takes these “vaccines” — even one injection of them. This includes DNA alteration in the body of a fetus of an expectant mother who takes modCOVID-19 “vaccines”, due to the fact that these “vaccines” cross the placenta and into the body of the fetus. (And, by the way, those same ingredients and mechanisms are present in all “descendant clone” modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” made by these companies, including the “booster shots” and the “latest version formula” injectables. This is because these are based on, and contain elements of, the original modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by these companies.)

Then, the second screenshot, below:

YT: **** Please read this phrase again, from Dr. McCullough, regarding the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna: “…sadly, both Pfizer and Moderna do permanently alter DNA via reverse transcription.” It is the “permanently alter DNA via reverse transcription” effects from these injectables that the COVID-19 “vaccinated” in the United States and all over the world are starting to present. It is impossible that the FDA did not know about the potential DNA-altering effects of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” — especially after scientific papers were published which demonstrated that this indeed is the case.

Another piece of the situation has just been published: According to the CDC, 76.4% of all American adults have at least one chronic disease (2023 figures), compared to baseline 2013 figures. The CDC paper is here: https://cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2025/04_0539.htm#ContribAff, “Trends in Multiple Chronic Conditions Among US Adults, By Life Stage, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2013 – 2023”, Kathleen B. Watson, MD, et al., 17 April 2025. All of the authors of this paper are either employees of the CDC; or, of the United States Uniformed Health Services. While it is true that chronic diseases, such as arthritis, can develop for many reasons during adult years, there is NOT ONE WORD in this paper regarding COVID-19 “vaccination” in this age group (18 years – 65+ years) being involved in the increase of any of the chronic diseases that are listed. In other words — the CDC still has its “head firmly in the sand” regarding the dangers and deadliness of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, and the role of these “vaccines” in inducing and/or aggravating multiple types of chronic conditions.

**** What are “COVID-19 “vaccinated” Joe or Jane Average American” going to do when they find out and understand (which they will, eventually) that the most fundamental “building block” of their body — their DNA — was deliberately and permanently altered without their knowledge or consent, if they took any injection of a Pfizer-BioNTech or a Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”? That it doesn’t matter when the “vaccine” injection was put into their body, or how many injections? That their modRNA COVID-19 “vaccinated” children ALSO had their DNA deliberately and permanently altered without their parents’ or guardian’s knowledge or consent? That the state and local governments who “mandated” or legislated that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” be taken by their children in order for them to attend school were complicit in the DNA alteration in their children?

**** What will “COVID-19 “vaccinated” Joe or Jane Average American” do when they find out and understand (which they will, eventually) that the altered DNA in their “vaccinated” body will “lurk” in the body and brain, creating permanent dysfunction of multiple organs of said body, until a modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced injury, illness, or disability presents later on? That is very likely no “cure” or “turning the clock back” for this altered DNA in the “vaccinated” body?

**** What will “COVID-19 “vaccinated” Joe or Jane Average American” do when they find out and understand (which they will, eventually) that the medical professionals they trusted when they took the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” have betrayed them at the most basic level —“Do No Harm”— by not doing the investigation which would have alerted them to this danger — but, which medical professionals, instead, followed the CDC / FDA / AMA mantras of, “The COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective”, and “The known and potential benefits of the COVID-19 vaccines outweigh the known and potential risks”?

The people who included the elements and mechanisms in the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” that guarantee the deliberate and permanent reverse-transcription of the LINE-1 DNA of every COVID-19 “vaccinated” person; the people who knew about these reverse-transcription elements and mechanisms, but still allowed EUAs and “FDA full approval” of these “vaccines” to proceed; the people who intentionally withheld vital information regarding the real dangers and deadliness of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” from President Trump45 during “Operation Warp Speed”; the people who, even today, are still “recommending” COVID-19 “vaccination” for anyone of any age (paging Dr. Martin Makary, current FDA Commissioner) — all must answer for their actions. All modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” must be removed from use and pulled off the market — now.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA


Health Friday 8.29.2025 Open Thread: Gain-of-Function Research Is Still Going On

The featured vintage image of a laboratory for today’s offering is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except perhaps for AI-generated images in links included in today’s post. If readers wish to add any AI-generated content to the discussion thread today, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Today’s offering is about the “under-the-table” work, the “being performed but under another name” work, the “grandfathered-in” work, of Gain-of-Function (GoF) experiments that are onoing. These GoF experiments involve experiments with mRNA-based platforms; with “inactivated virus” platforms; and, with “novel delivery” platforms. These GoF experiments are being funded by “private Big Money”; and, by the United States government (in other words, with taxpayer money.) This post is long; please bear with me.

It is now well-known that the COVID-19 disaster was a product of GoF experiments, of two types: One, the GoF work that was performed in various labs (the Baric Lab at UNC, Chapel Hill; the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Wuhan, Communist China; the United States Army biological weapons labs at Ft. Detrick, Maryland, among others.) And, Two, the GoF work that was performed using the lab-created Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 virus itself as the foundation for the modRNA (aka mRNA) COVID-19 “vaccines” that were developed by numerous companies, among them: PfizerUSA (at the company’s Pearl River, New York, facility; and, at other facilities); and, BioNTech (Mainz, Germany); Moderna (with the NIAID in Bethesda, Maryland, and at other facilities) — for use in the United States and also world-wide. (Note: PfizerUSA and BioNTech are separate companies that operate as a “joint venture” called Pfizer-BioNTech. PfizerUSA and BioNTech each have a separate CEO [Chief Executive Officer].)

Three articles by Jon Fleetwood start today’s offering. The first is here: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/260-children-infected-with-tubersulosis, “260 Children Infected With Tuberculosis in Gates-Funded Study Injecting Children with Live Mycobacterium bovis Bacteria: “New England Journal of Medicine'”, 8 May 2025. The second is here: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/new-bill-gates-funded-chimeric-polio, “New Bill Gates-Funded Chimeric Polio Vaccine Sheds 100% in Recipients, Spread Documented: ‘The Lancet’ Journal”, 18 August 2025. The third is here: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/bill-gates-funds-slim-microneedle, “Bill Gates Funds ‘SLIM’ Microneedle Tech That Self-Assembles Inside the Body”, 24 April 2025.

Regarding the first Jon Fleetwood article: The 260 study subject children were living in South Africa, and were between the ages of 10 and 18 years. They were confirmed by to be HIV-negative at the time they were added to the study subject pool. They were injected with the Danish tuberculosis vaccine BCG1331 strain (Bacille Calmette-Guerin). The Package Insert for this vaccine is here: https://nibsc.org/documents/ifu/07-270.pdf. The BCG1331 strain is the Mycobacterium bovis strain, which causes tuberculosis in cattle and can also cause the disease in humans, especially in HIV-compromised persons. Please see the screenshot from the Fleetwood article, below:

The paper that resulted from the study is here: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2412381, “BCG Revaccination for the Prevention of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection”, Alexander C Schmidt, et al., 8 May 2025. Please see the screenshot from this paper, below:

In other words, 260 children now have tuberculosis because of the BCG1331 strain vaccine that they were injected with. And that Bill Gates funded this “human guinea-pig experiment.” But there’s more — the Fleetwood article also describes the Bill Gates-funded Mycobacterium bovis experiments at the University of Texas, performed in 2012, that resulted in a what may be called a “turbo-charged Gain-of-Function” version of this tuberculosis bacterium. The paper that was published from the 2012 study is here: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-9792(13)70007-6, “Mycobacterium tuberculosis MtrAY102C is a gain-of-function mutant that potentially acts as a constitutively active protein”, Akash T Satsangi, et al., published December 2013.

Regarding the second Fleetwood article: Another Bill Gates-funded effort, this time about a lab-created chimeric polio oral “vaccine” that was tested on human subjects in the United States. The study results are nothing short of terrifying. Please the screenshot from the Fleetwood article, below:

There was a 100% incidence of “shedding” of this lab-created chimeric oral polio “vaccine.” Six human subjects were released from the study when it was found that testing of their stool showed they had possibly contracted the oral vaccine virus from other study subjects. Several human subjects had severe adverse reactions to this lab-created chimeric oral polio “vaccine.” This lab-created chimeric oral polio “vaccine” caused “unexpected” interactions with the type 2 poliovirus.

The team that lab-created this chimeric oral polio “vaccine” were from medical centers across the United States, including: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; University of Vermont; and, Dartmouth. The paper that was published from the study is here: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(25)00285-3/fulltext, “Safety and immunogenicity of novel live attenuated type 1 and type 3 oral poliomyelitis vaccines in healthy adults in the USA: a first-in-human, observer-masked, multicentre, phase 1 randomized controlled trial”, Laina D Mercer, PhD, et al., 13 August 2025. The clinical trial for this lab-created chimeric polio virus “vaccine” is listed here: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04529538. Again, from the Fleetwood article:

Regarding the third Fleetwood article: Bill Gates has funded the creation of a new technology, called “SLIM microneedle”, which injects “microcrystals” of a contraceptive drug (levonorgestrel) into the body of a female; and, which microcrystals then”self-assemble” into an “implant” inside her body. Please see the screenshot from the Fleetwood article on this situation, below:

This type of “self-injected, self-assembly inside the body” approach has profound implications. Please see below, again from the Fleetwood article:

The paper that was published on this issue is here: https://www.nature.com/articles/s44286-025-00194-x, “Self-aggregating long-lasting injectable microcrystals”, Vivian K. Feig, et al., 24 March 2025. Note how “self-assembling” has magically become “self-aggregating” — in some attempt to hide the fact that the microcrystals really do “self-assemble?”

The SLIM “delivery system” for the contraceptive levonorgestrel (called “LNG” in the paper above) uses a solvent called Benzyl Benzoate (called “BB” in the paper above.) The paper describes the experiments performed to find the “right combination” of levonorgestrel + Benzyl Benzoate to create the SLIM delivery system — the “winning delivery system candidate” was named “LNG-BB.” Benzyl Benzoate is clearly dangerous. Part of Section 4 FIRST AID MEASURES from the MSDS Safety Sheet on Benzyl Benzoate from Spectrum Chemical (https://www.spectrumchemical.com/) is below:

And this is the “long-lasting solvent” that is used in the SLIM microneedle “self-aggregating” delivery system for levonorgestrel. Which means that this solvent will be acting in the body of the female who uses this delivery system for this drug for an (undetermined) amount of time.

Now, on to a recent GoF experiment, this one funded by NIH / NIAID, at the University of Pittsburgh. This GoF experiment resulted in the lab-creation of a chimeric H5N1 Avian Influenza virus strain that could infect dairy cattle. Jon Fleetwood wrote about this situation, here: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/nih-funded-pennsylvania-researchers, “NIH-Funded Pennsylvania Researchers Build New Frankenstein Bird Flu Virus: ‘Journal of Virology'”, 26 August 2025. Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) is a virus that infects horses and cattle. In humans, Stomatitis infection can result in HSV-1 (the “cold sore” virus: per https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/stomatitis-oral-mucositis.) However, the researchers at the University of Pittsburgh concentrated on “splicing” an element of VSV with H5N1. The paper that was published from this experiment is here: https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00621-25, “Dairy cattle herds mount a characteristic antibody response to highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza viruses”, Kevin R. McCarthy, et al., 25 August 2025. Please see the screenshots from the Fleetwood article on this issue, below:

Isn’t it “convenient timing” that this “new, chimeric VSV + H5N1 virus” comes on the heels of the announcement by the White House on 5 May 2025, that Gain-of-Function research would be stopped — but it appears that “certain contracts” would be permitted to “finish out”? And, that one of those “certain contracts” is with Arcturus Therapeutics for its self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) Avian Influenza “vaccine”, ARCT-2304? The White House announcement is here: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/05/improving-the-safety-and-security-of-biological-research/. The news release related to the second quarter 2025 financial update and “pipeline progress” for Arcturus Therapeutics in which ARCT-2304 is mentioned, is here: https://www.biospace.com/press-releases/arcturus-therapeutics-announces-second-quarter-2025-financial-update-and-pipeline-progress, 12 August 2025. The clinical trial for ARCT-2304 is registered here: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06602531; which, by the way, has NO saline-only Placebo control group; the only “control groups” in the study will be injected with a “control vaccine” or a “placebo vaccine” (which last, in and of itself, is not a true Placebo.)

And now, regarding something else: the GoF experiments that resulted in the lab-creation of an Avian Influenza “vaccine” which is a “Cocktail of Inactivated Avian Influenza Viruses”, a patent owned by Dr. Jeffery Taubenberger, a “career medical employee” of HHS and the federal government, and who is also the current Acting Director of the NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, previously headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci), and who now is in control of the $500 Million dollars that was pulled from mRNA research activities in May 2025. This “bird flu vaccine cocktail” contains BPL (Beta-propiolactone), a known carcinogen.

The NIH TechTransfer information on this “cocktail” invention by Dr. Taubenberger is here: https://www.techtransfer.nih.gov/tech/tab-3388, “Broadly Protective Influenza Vaccine Compromising a Cocktail of Inactivated Avian Influenza Viruses”. Sounds “benign,” yes? Until one starts reading the actual Patent document itself, found here: https://image-ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/11369675, filed 21 July 2020. The following are screenshots from the Patent document:

Note it appears that Dr. Taubenberger was experimenting with as many as sixteen different strains of Avian Influenza to lab-create his “cocktail vaccine.”

Note it appears that Dr. Taubenberger is perfectly all right with “vaginal” and “rectal” administration of his “cocktail vaccine.”

Note that the Patent was registered in July 2020 — which can only mean that work on the experiments to lab-create this “Avian Influenza cocktail vaccine” must have begun at least nine months earlier. This would place the commencement of the experiments around October 2019 — just before the COVID-19 original virus was unleashed on on the world.

Here are two screenshots from the MSDS Safety Sheet for Beta-propiolactone from Sigma Aldritch (https://www.sigmaaldritch.com/US/en/sds/sigma/p5648):

And THIS ingredient is part of the “Avian Influenza Cocktail Vaccine” of Dr. Jeffery Taubenberger, two possible methods of administration of which are INTRANASAL or INHALED, per the Patent document images above?

It is not enough that HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., terminated 22 contracts for mRNA research in May of this year, but allowed “certain contracts” for mRNA (and saRNA) research to “finish out.” It is not enough that the White House announced a ban on Gain-of-Function research, since this type of research is still going on — funded by “private Big Money”, and/or by the NIH / NIAID (in other words, the United States government). The entire Gain-of-Function situation must be stopped, from all funding sources and on all levels of research and experimentation — until there are clear, firm, and enforceable regulations and restrictions on who can perform this type of research; that such research can only be permitted under strict circumstances; that such research must be under tight supervision; and, that such research can only be performed where there is a clear need in the area of public health — not what amounts to a “chimeric fishing expedition” to lab-create viruses. It is time for any and all “go-along-to-get-along” activities to stop — such as, bowing to the “demand” by Sen. Dr. Bill Cassidy for his “cooperation” in “working with” HHS as regards hiring, or anything else. By the way — Sen. Dr. Cassidy has received donations from multiple pharmaceutical entities (United Health, AstraZeneca, Pediatrix Medical Group, and so on: per Open Secrets (https://opensecrets.org/.) And — that the further development of the above-discussed “Avian Influenza Cocktail Vaccine” must be stopped.

HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr.: Please understand that the “career medical bureaucrats” in the CDC, the FDA, and the other divisions of the HHS, are not inclined to your views. They want “the good old days” of these divisions brought back. They are working “behind the scenes” in some instances, and in other instances, out in the open, to obstruct, delay, and thwart your efforts to clean up HHS and “re-tool” the department to reflect Make American Healthy Again. There is even what may be called “soft interference” by persons not employed by HHS such as, Sen. Dr. Cassidy.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA